Customer Contact Ranked Scheduling Assistance System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Business professionals face challenges in efficiently scheduling customer meetings due to diverse geographic locations and varying meeting frequency needs, leading to inefficient time usage and potential neglect of important relationships.

Innovation Solution

A customer contact ranked scheduling assistance system that prioritizes meetings based on revenue-based criticality ranking, using CRM platforms to determine meeting frequencies and deadlines, and groups meetings by geographic location to minimize travel and maximize revenue generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If meetings are scheduled based on diverse geographic locations and varying frequencies, then customer coverage is improved, but time usage efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer coverageVSAvoidtime usage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system assigns different meeting frequencies to different customers based on their specific characteristics such as revenue contribution, geographic location, and relationship importance. High-value customers receive more frequent meetings while lower-priority customers are visited less often, optimizing the professional's time allocation across diverse customer bases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts meeting frequency parameters for each customer based on multiple factors including revenue percentage, geographic zone, and time since last meeting. This parameter-based scheduling automatically optimizes the schedule to maximize revenue generation while minimizing unnecessary travel and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If meeting frequency is increased for all customers, then relationship maintenance is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelationship maintenanceVSAvoidoverall productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying uniform meeting frequencies to all customers, the system applies partial action by concentrating meeting efforts on high-priority customers who contribute most to revenue. This ensures critical relationships are maintained with sufficient frequency while reducing or eliminating unnecessary meetings with lower-priority customers, thereby preserving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The customer base is segmented into different priority levels based on revenue contribution and relationship importance. The system then applies different meeting frequency strategies to each segment, ensuring that high-value customers receive adequate attention for relationship maintenance while low-priority customers are served more efficiently with less frequent contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of time

If travel is minimized by grouping meetings, then time efficiency is improved, but scheduling flexibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel timeVSAvoidscheduling flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple customer meetings into single travel routes by grouping customers in the same or nearby geographic zones. This consolidation minimizes travel time and resources while the underlying ranking system maintains scheduling flexibility by allowing professionals to select from multiple high-priority customers within each zone based on availability and urgency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20230222452A1System and method for customer contact ranked scheduling assistance
Publication Date: 2023.07.13 RAMD SOLUTIONS
  • US20230222452A1 patent drawing
  • US20230222452A1 patent drawing
  • US20230222452A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of ranking criticality of upcoming customer meetings may comprise receiving, via a network interface device, for a plurality of customers, a meeting deadline date, a meeting frequency value, and a previous sales factor rate indicating revenue or a percentage of previous meetings that resulted in revenue to a user, determining, via a processor, for the plurality of customers, a past due percentage value by dividing the number of days elapsed since the meeting deadline date by a number of days within the meeting frequency value, and determining, for each of the plurality of customers, a criticality ranking by weighting the past due percentage value with the previous sales factor rate. Displaying, via a graphical user interface (GUI), the plurality of customers, listed in order of the criticality ranking, from highest to lowest, for scheduling of upcoming meetings in order of criticality.