Customer Preference Scoring and Feedback for Item Substitutions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

E-commerce platforms face challenges in recommending suitable substitute items when ordered products become unavailable, often leading to decreased sales and customer dissatisfaction due to inadequate consideration of customer preferences and item characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A smart substitution computing device uses a customer understanding model to generate preference scores for substitute items based on order data and customer attributes, combining relevance and preference scores to rank substitutes, and iteratively improves the model using performance data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If substitute items are recommended without considering customer preferences and item characteristics, then the substitution process is simple and fast, but customer satisfaction decreases and sales are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstitution process simplicityVSAvoidcustomer acceptance of substitute
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects feedback data from customers about their acceptance or rejection of substitute items and uses this feedback to iteratively retrain and improve the machine learning model. This creates a closed-loop system where substitution recommendations continuously improve based on actual customer responses, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and customer acceptance reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts recommendation parameters by considering multiple item characteristics (category, brand, price, attributes) and customer preferences simultaneously. The machine learning model optimizes weighting of these parameters to generate substitution scores that balance operational efficiency with customer satisfaction, allowing the system to adapt recommendations based on changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a comprehensive model considering multiple customer attributes and item characteristics is used, then customer acceptance increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer acceptance of substituteVSAvoidsubstitution model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs self-training by automatically consuming feedback data and retraining itself to improve performance. This self-service capability allows the system to handle increased complexity of comprehensive customer and item attribute analysis while maintaining operational efficiency, as the model autonomously optimizes without requiring manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the complex substitution problem into distinct analytical components: customer attribute analysis, item characteristic analysis, preference scoring, and acceptance prediction. Each component processes specific data types independently before integrating results, which manages complexity while achieving comprehensive evaluation for improved customer acceptance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If substitute recommendations are made without iterative model improvement, then implementation is faster, but performance and accuracy remain suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstitution implementation speedVSAvoidsubstitution recommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-collecting and storing customer feedback data and item characteristic data in ready-to-use formats. This preliminary preparation allows the machine learning model to be rapidly retrained when needed without delaying substitution recommendations, maintaining implementation speed while enabling continuous accuracy improvement through iterative model updates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12367518B2Methods and apparatuses for recommending substitutions made during order fulfillment processes
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US12367518B2 patent drawing
  • US12367518B2 patent drawing
  • US12367518B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is configured to train a customer understanding model to generate a preference score for substitution items. The customer understanding model generates a preference score for each of a plurality of related substitution items based on order data including data indicative of at least one item ordered and location data indicating a location of a first store. The customer understanding model ranks each of the substitution items based on the preference score. Order data is transmitted including substitution data identifying each of the substitution items and corresponding rank. Performance data associated with a set of operations implemented based on the order data and the substitution data is obtained. An updated customer understanding model is trained based on the performance data and iteratively modified based on the updated training dataset and updated performance metrics generated from second performance data.