Customer Profitability Indicator Aggregation Across Business Divisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large companies with multiple divisions face difficulties in understanding the net impact of customer relationships across different business segments, leading to suboptimal decision-making due to lack of integrated profitability and risk analysis.

Innovation Solution

A method for evaluating customers by collecting and calculating division performance metrics across multiple business segments, generating customer division profit and risk indicators, and aggregating these to provide a customer business profit and risk indicator, which are then displayed for informed decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a customer is evaluated separately for each division, then division-specific decision-making is simplified, but the overall business cannot understand the net impact of customer relationships across divisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedivision-specific decision-makingVSAvoidnet impact of customer relationships across divisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The customer evaluation is segmented into division-level components (customer division profit indicator, customer division risk indicator) and then aggregated to the business level. This allows both division-specific analysis and overall business impact assessment to be performed systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges division-level profit indicators and risk indicators into aggregated business-level indicators (customer business profit indicator, customer business risk indicator). This combining process enables the business to understand the net impact of customer relationships across all divisions while maintaining the ability to analyze individual division contributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Device complexity

If only division-level customer data is collected, then data collection is simpler, but integrated profitability and risk analysis across the business is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection structureVSAvoidintegrated profitability and risk analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The data collection system is designed to capture division-level information that can serve multiple purposes: analyzing individual division performance, assessing overall business impact, and supporting integrated profitability and risk analysis. The same division-level data feeds into both division-specific and business-level indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds an aggregation dimension to the data structure, transforming division-level data into business-level indicators. This dimensional change enables integrated analysis without requiring fundamentally new data collection mechanisms, as the business-level indicators are derived from existing division-level data through aggregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If division-level profit and risk indicators are calculated separately, then division performance is clearly understood, but the net business impact is obscured by multiple separate metrics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedivision performance measurementVSAvoidnumber of separate metrics
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple division-level metrics (profit indicator and risk indicator for each division) into aggregated business-level indicators. This merging reduces the number of separate metrics that need to be interpreted while maintaining the precision of division-level analysis, as the aggregated indicators are derived from the same division-level data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The aggregated business-level indicators act as intermediaries that translate and summarize the multiple division-level metrics into a single business perspective. These intermediary indicators provide a clear view of net business impact without requiring decision-makers to process multiple separate division-level metrics simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8620802B1Consumer-level financial performance analysis
Publication Date: 2013.12.31 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US8620802B1 patent drawing
  • US8620802B1 patent drawing
  • US8620802B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of evaluating customers is provided. The method is used for customers of two or more divisions of a business. The method involves collecting information indicative of the customer's influence on division performance metrics of several divisions of a business, where the division performance metrics each influence a business performance metric of the business. After it is collected, the information is electronically stored. The method includes the step of periodically calculating a customer division profit indicator for each of the divisions based on the information. The method also includes the step of periodically calculating a customer business profit indicator based on the customer division profit indicators, where the customer business profit indicator indicates a net influence of the customer on profits of the business. One or more of the customer division profit indicators and the customer business profit indicator are transmitted for display on a display device.