Customized Lingual Brackets via Selective Laser Melting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing methods for lingual orthodontic brackets are standardized, failing to meet individual patient needs, leading to discomfort and inefficiency due to inadequate adaptation to the complex tooth surface and stimulation of the tongue.

Innovation Solution

The direct manufacturing of customized lingual orthodontic brackets using selective laser melting, involving precise measurement of dentition data, 3D CAD modeling, and layer-by-layer production with high accuracy and customizable materials like dental gold and titanium alloys, to create brackets that closely match the tooth surface and minimize twisting errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If standardized brackets are used for lingual orthodontics, then manufacturing cost and time are reduced, but adaptability to individual tooth surfaces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to individual tooth surfaceVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A digital 3D model of the patient's tooth surface is created in advance through scanning, allowing customization planning before manufacturing. This preliminary digital preparation enables the subsequent selective laser melting process to produce highly adaptive brackets without requiring complex manual adjustment steps during the manufacturing process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing process transitions from standardized mass production to customized production by changing key parameters including tooth surface geometry data, bracket dimensions, and material properties. The selective laser melting process allows precise control of these parameters to match individual patient anatomy while maintaining manufacturing efficiency through digital workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If smaller brackets are used to fit complex tooth surfaces, then adaptability improves, but manufacturing precision requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitting accuracy on tooth surfaceVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Traditional mechanical manufacturing methods are replaced with selective laser melting, an additive manufacturing process that uses laser energy to selectively fuse metal powder layer by layer. This substitution enables superior manufacturing precision for small, complex bracket geometries by building them directly from digital 3D models with micrometer-level accuracy, eliminating the limitations of subtractive or formative mechanical processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing approach transitions from 2D or 3D subtractive processes to 4D additive manufacturing (3D space plus time/layer accumulation). This dimensional change allows gradual building of complex small-scale bracket structures with precise geometric control at each layer, achieving high fitting accuracy on complex tooth surfaces that would be difficult or impossible to obtain through traditional mechanical manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If more adhesive is used to fill gaps between bracket and tooth, then bracket stability improves, but risk of detachment worsens due to increased adhesive volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebracket stabilityVSAvoidrisk of detachment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies surface treatment techniques that modify the adhesive interface properties, creating optimal bonding conditions between the bracket and tooth surface. By controlling surface energy and wettability characteristics, the adhesive forms a thin, uniform layer with maximum bonding strength, eliminating the need for thick adhesive applications that would increase detachment risk while maintaining excellent bracket stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Object-affected harmful factors

If lingual brackets are used for orthodontics, then aesthetic appearance and tooth protection improve, but tongue stimulation and discomfort worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appearance and tooth protectionVSAvoidtongue stimulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The bracket design incorporates locally optimized features including reduced thickness in areas that contact or near the tongue, selective reinforcement only where structurally necessary for orthodontic function, and surface finish variations that minimize irritation. This local quality approach allows the bracket to maintain strength and functionality while reducing tongue stimulation in specific critical areas, resolving the contradiction between protection benefits and discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables highly customized, accurately fitting lingual orthodontic brackets that reduce discomfort and enhance treatment efficiency by minimizing adhesive use and optimizing the bracket's interaction with the tooth surface, while reducing manufacturing time and cost.

Implementation Method 1

Selective laser melting technique is an emerging and rapidly maturing prototyping technique and it has been utilized in the medical field. It can be used to directly manufacture lingual brackets which is usually composed of metal materials such as dental gold alloy or titanium alloys.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective Laser Melting: Laser

Implementation Method 2

produce the brackets by laminated manufacturing directly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Data Source

PatentUS8694142B2Direct manufacturing method of selective laser melting of customized tongue-side orthodontic support grooves
Publication Date: 2014.04.08 SOUTH CHINA UNIV OF TECH
  • US8694142B2 patent drawing
  • US8694142B2 patent drawing
  • US8694142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention has provided a direct manufacturing methodology of customized lingual orthodontic brackets by selective laser melting. The procedure is as follows. First of all, measure the dentition data and construct the 3D CAD model of the teeth through reverse engineering. Then a single soleplate of the lingual bracket contacting the tooth surface, as well as the ideal slot position is designed based on the teeth features. The designed models are later imported into the SLM machine and used to produce the brackets with desired materials directly. This method can actualize customized manufacture with highly accuracy, producing highly matched brackets all at once. The invention not only saves time and cost, but also has wide adaptation range and is able to adopt various raw materials. Different raw materials can be utilized in one step to accommodate specific capacity requirement of different parts of the brackets.