Cut-Resistant Fall Arrest Line with Overlapping Force Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fall arrest systems are inadequate in preventing safety line tearing during falls over leading edges and do not provide sufficient safety compliance and support during such events.

Innovation Solution

A fall arrest system incorporating a self-retracting lanyard with a cut-resistant, flat webbing safety line and an energy absorber, where the safety line and energy absorber forces are optimized to overlap within specific standard deviations, ensuring the system can handle fall forces effectively without excessive stress on the safety line.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional safety line is used in fall arrest systems, then the system structure is simple, but the safety line may tear during falls over leading edges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety line tear resistanceVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining a flat webbing safety line with an energy absorber featuring a tear tape constructed from multiple layers of webbing material bonded together. This composite structure prevents tearing at the leading edge by distributing stress across multiple bonded layers, thereby improving reliability without significantly increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The energy absorber is positioned between the safety line and the harness to provide beforehand cushioning. When a fall occurs over a leading edge, the energy absorber activates first to absorb impact energy and reduce the force transmitted to the safety line, preventing tearing before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Length of moving object

If the energy absorber deployment force is high, then the stopping distance is short, but the safety line may exceed its breaking strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestopping distanceVSAvoidsafety line breaking strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by carefully selecting and matching the force-displacement characteristics of the energy absorber and safety line. The energy absorber is chosen to have a deployment force that, when combined with the safety line's breaking strength and standard deviation, creates an overlapping region with a ratio less than or equal to 6. This statistical parameter matching ensures that even under variable conditions, the safety line will not exceed its breaking strength while maintaining an acceptable stopping distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the safety line breaking force is much higher than energy absorber deployment force, then the safety line is stronger, but the system is not optimized for leading edge falls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety line breaking forceVSAvoidleading edge fall protection
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the force parameters by selecting an energy absorber whose deployment force creates a specific overlap with the safety line's breaking strength distribution. Rather than making the safety line much stronger than the energy absorber, the system is designed so that the mean difference and standard deviations create an overlapping region ratio ≤6. This balanced parameter selection ensures both components work together effectively during leading edge falls, improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The energy absorber serves as beforehand cushioning positioned to activate first during leading edge falls. By absorbing energy before the safety line reaches its breaking point, the system ensures that even if the safety line has high breaking strength, the energy absorber prevents excessive force transmission, optimizing protection against leading edge falls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents safety line tearing and enhances user safety during falls over leading edges by ensuring the safety line and energy absorber forces are balanced, reducing the risk of failure and improving safety compliance.

Implementation Method 1

an energy absorber configured for connecting to a terminal end of the safety line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption:

Implementation Method 2

a braking mechanism for controlling the rotation of the drum and the resulting unwinding or winding of the safety line from/into the drum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

The SRL has a housing with a rotatable drum having a safety line wound about the drum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 4

The braking mechanism of the SRL is configured for slowing down and stopping the rotation of the drum when the safety line unwinds too rapidly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11633634B2Cut-resistant leading edge fall arrest system and method
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 MSA TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • US11633634B2 patent drawing
  • US11633634B2 patent drawing
  • US11633634B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fall arrest system includes a line retraction device having a safety line, an energy absorber configured for connecting to a terminal end of the safety line, and a harness configured for connecting to the energy absorber such that the energy absorber is disposed between the terminal end of the safety line and the harness. The safety line is selected to have a predetermined mean breaking force with a first standard deviation, and the energy absorber is selected to have a predetermined mean deployment force with a second standard deviation. The mean breaking force of the safety line and the mean deployment force of the energy absorber overlap over an overlapping region of the first and second standard deviation. A ratio of an overlap mean force of the overlapping region to an overlap standard deviation of the overlapping region is less than or equal to 6.