Cut-Resistant Security Panel for Anti-Theft Bags

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security bag designs, such as those using metal mesh or netting, are difficult to assemble, bulky, unattractive, and may not provide adequate security, especially for handbags with car straps, as they can be easily cut or snatched.

Innovation Solution

A security bag featuring a security panel assembly with layers of flexible material and a matrix of cut-resistant wires or cables stitched between them, which is integrated into the bag's construction to prevent cutting and snatching, including a flexible cable in the carry strap and secure zipper closures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If metal mesh or netting is placed over the bag to enhance security, then cutting resistance is improved, but the bag becomes bulky and difficult to assemble

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting resistanceVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines cut-resistant wire or cable with flexible material layers to create a composite security panel assembly. This composite structure provides cutting resistance while maintaining flexibility and ease of assembly, as the wire is integrated between layers rather than being a separate mesh overlay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The security feature is divided into discrete components: the wire or cable, the first flexible material layer, and the second flexible material layer. These segmented components are assembled in a systematic manner with the wire positioned between the layers and secured through stitching, reducing assembly complexity compared to monolithic mesh structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If metal mesh or netting is used for security, then cutting resistance is improved, but the bag becomes unattractive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting resistanceVSAvoidaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The wire or cable is positioned specifically between the flexible material layers at locations where cutting resistance is most needed, rather than using a comprehensive mesh that compromises aesthetics. The flexible material layers provide the aesthetic surface while the wire provides localized security enhancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure of wire between flexible material layers allows the outer material layers to maintain their aesthetic appearance while the embedded wire provides cutting resistance. The flexible material layers can be chosen to match desired aesthetic qualities without the wire being visible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If existing security designs are used, then some security protection is provided, but they do not provide adequate security for handbags with car straps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidprotection against snatching
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The security panel assembly with wire or cable provides multi-functional security: it prevents cutting through the bag material and also secures the car strap to prevent snatching. The wire is integrated into the bag construction in a way that serves both cutting protection and strap security functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure of wire between flexible material layers creates a security system that addresses multiple threat vectors: cutting attacks and snatching attacks. The wire provides tensile strength to resist cutting while also securing the car strap to prevent removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If wire mesh is integrated into the bag, then cutting resistance is improved, but the bag becomes bulky

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting resistanceVSAvoidbag bulk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses flexible material layers as thin film-like structures that enclose the wire rather than using a bulky mesh structure. The flexible material layers provide a thin, flexible enclosure that maintains bag flexibility while protecting the wire, reducing overall bulk compared to traditional mesh implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure compresses the wire and flexible material layers into a compact integrated assembly that provides cutting resistance without significant bulk. The wire is positioned between the layers and secured through stitching, creating a space-efficient security feature that maintains bag flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP3560373B1Cut-proof Anti-theft bag construction
Publication Date: 2021.03.17 TRAVEL CADDY INC
  • EP3560373B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3560373B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3560373B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In one form, a security handbag is provided that includes an interior security panel assembly (400, 448) with a matrix of wires (428) secured between a pair of material layers (406, 408). The interior security panel assembly can be positioned intermediate the bag outside wall and a lining of the bag. A strap with security cable and a carbineer attachment device can be attached to be handbag. Methods for forming such security panel assemblies are also provided.