Conical Shield Cutterhead Load Calculation for Steel I-Beam Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for calculating cutterhead load during shield cutting of steel-reinforced concrete diaphragm walls fail to consider the conical design of the cutterhead, leading to inaccuracies when cutting steel I-beam joints, affecting the construction process.

Innovation Solution

A method combining numerical simulation with a theoretical model to calculate cutterhead load, considering the positional relationship between disc cutters and the diaphragm wall, partitioning disc cutters based on their positions, and using time parameters to evaluate the cutting state of each disc cutter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If theoretical methods are used to calculate force on disc cutters, then calculation process is simple, but accuracy is insufficient when cutting steel I-beam joints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of force calculationVSAvoidcomplexity of calculation method
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines theoretical calculation methods with numerical simulation methods to create a hybrid approach. The theoretical model provides the foundational calculation framework while numerical simulation adds correction factors and refinement, achieving high accuracy without fully committing to complex simulation for all calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The calculation process is divided into distinct segments: theoretical calculation for baseline forces, numerical simulation for validation and refinement, and a hybrid integration step that combines both results. This segmentation allows each method to be applied where it is most effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If numerical simulation methods are used to study cutterhead interaction with steel I-beam joints, then accuracy is improved, but modeling process becomes cumbersome and calculation load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of interaction analysisVSAvoidcomplexity of modeling process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies numerical simulation only partially - specifically for validating the theoretical model and analyzing critical steel I-beam joint interactions, rather than using it for all cutterhead calculations. This selective application maintains accuracy where needed while avoiding unnecessary computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The developed model serves multiple functions: it can perform theoretical calculations for general cases, switch to numerical simulation for complex steel I-beam joint scenarios, and provide a unified framework that works for both diaphragm wall cutting and steel beam joint cutting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If shield cutterhead is treated as a flat plane in calculations, then calculation method is simple, but accuracy is insufficient for conical cutterhead design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of cutterhead load calculationVSAvoidcomplexity of calculation model
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different geometric representations to different parts of the cutterhead system. The overall cutterhead structure uses a conical geometry model for accurate load distribution, while local disc cutter positions are calculated with precise spatial coordinates that account for the cone surface geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional flat plane representation to a three-dimensional conical surface representation of the cutterhead. This adds the radial dimension and accounts for the taper angle, enabling accurate calculation of disc cutter positions and load distribution across the conical surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20260030411A1Method for calculating cutterhead load during shield cutting of diaphragm wall with steel i-beam
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 HANGZHOU METRO GRP CO LTD
  • US20260030411A1 patent drawing
  • US20260030411A1 patent drawing
  • US20260030411A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for calculating a cutterhead load during shield cutting of a diaphragm wall with a steel I-beam is provided. Numerical model parameters and operating state parameters of numerical simulation models are determined. The numerical simulation models are constructed. A disc cutter cutting linear velocity and a time interval between two adjacent disc cutter cutting actions are changed, and an interaction process between disc cutters varying in position on a cutterhead and the steel I-beam joint is simulated. Force-time mapping relationships of the disc cutters are outputted. Each disc cutter is numbered. A disc cutter database is constructed. The disc cutters are partitioned. Time parameters of each disc cutter are defined. A validity of the time parameters at a preset moment is evaluated. Valid time parameters are calculated. Vertical forces and rolling torques of the disc cutters with the valid time parameters are summed to calculate the cutterhead load.