Cutting Bit Assembly Retainer System for Mining Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional continuous mining machines face challenges in efficiently securing and replacing cutting bits due to their design, which often results in damage and wear during operation, necessitating a secure yet easily removable mechanism.

Innovation Solution

The cutting bit assembly incorporates a holder and sleeve with a retainer system that includes a groove and resilient member, allowing for quick attachment and detachment of the bit by engaging a projection and shoulder mechanism, preventing rotational movement and facilitating easy replacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional cutting bit designs are used, then the bits can be securely held during operation, but they are difficult to replace quickly and suffer from damage and wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of bit replacementVSAvoidbit security during operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting bit assembly is divided into separable components: the bit, the holder, and the retainer. This segmentation allows the bit to be securely held during operation through the retainer mechanism while enabling quick replacement by simply removing the retainer, thus resolving the contradiction between bit security and ease of replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer is designed with resilient members (springs) that provide dynamic locking and unlocking capabilities. The resilient members allow the retainer to engage securely with the holder during operation, then easily disengage when force is applied for replacement, enabling the system to transition between secure holding and easy replacement states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If conventional bit securing mechanisms are used, then bits remain fixed during operation, but replacement time increases and downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemining efficiencyVSAvoidbit replacement downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer is pre-configured with resilient members and engagement features that are ready to secure the bit immediately upon installation. This preliminary preparation of the locking mechanism eliminates the need for complex securing operations during bit replacement, thus reducing replacement downtime and improving mining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer mechanism is extracted as a separate, removable component from the holder assembly. This allows the bit to be quickly replaced by simply removing the retainer without having to disassemble the entire holder or use specialized tools, significantly reducing replacement time and improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If simple bit attachment mechanisms are used, then replacement is easy, but rotational movement and bit stability are not prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of bit attachmentVSAvoidbit rotational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer and holder are designed with asymmetric engagement features including specific projection geometries and groove configurations. This asymmetry ensures that the retainer can only be installed in one orientation and prevents rotational movement of the bit during operation, while still allowing easy attachment by simply aligning and pressing the asymmetric features together

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Reliability

If complex retainer systems are used, then bit security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit securing reliabilityVSAvoidretainer system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple securing functions are merged into a single retainer component: axial retention, rotational prevention, and resilient locking are all integrated into one piece. This consolidation provides reliable bit securing without increasing device complexity, as the combined functions are achieved through the retainer's integrated geometry rather than multiple separate components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the security of cutting bits during operation while allowing for rapid replacement, reducing downtime and improving the efficiency of mining processes by ensuring consistent bit performance.

Implementation Method 1

The resilient member engages the second surface of the holder and biases the retainer along the shank axis and away from the holder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3329096B1Cutting bit assembly
Publication Date: 2021.07.07 JOY GLOBAL UNDERGROUND MINING LLC
  • EP3329096B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3329096B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3329096B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A cutting bit assembly for a mining machine includes a holder having a first surface, a second surface, and a bore extending therebetween, and a bit having a first end and a second end. The bit further includes a tip, a shank, and a shoulder positioned between the tip and the shank. The shank is positioned in the bore of the holder and defines a shank axis. The shoulder engages the first surface of the holder. The shank includes a projection adjacent the second end. The cutting bit assembly also includes a retainer having a groove and a resilient member. The groove engages a portion of the projection. The resilient portion engages the second surface of the holder and biases the retainer along the shank axis and away from the holder.