Corner-Foot Cutting Board for Clean Contact and Nesting Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting boards fail to prevent cross-contamination and surface contact with countertops, leading to potential biological hazards and inefficient drying when stacked or stored.

Innovation Solution

A cutting board design featuring feet at each corner that extend beyond the board's surfaces and edges, with concave and supple bottoms for non-slip contact and convex tops for nesting, allowing the board to stand vertically or stack securely without surfaces touching, thereby preventing cross-contamination and promoting airflow for drying.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the cutting board is designed with feet extending beyond all surfaces and edges, then cross-contamination is prevented and food safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-contamination preventionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting board is segmented by adding four separate feet at the corners, each extending beyond the board edges. This segmentation prevents the board surface from contacting the countertop, eliminating cross-contamination while keeping each foot as a simple, independent component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The feet act as intermediary elements between the cutting board and the countertop surface. These feet elevate the board, creating an airspace that prevents direct contact and potential contamination while allowing the board to remain stable on the surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the bottom surface of feet is made concave and supple for non-slip contact, then stability is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-slip stabilityVSAvoidconcave surface precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom surface of each foot is designed with a concave curvature and supple material properties. This parameter change allows the foot to conform to the countertop surface, creating a non-slip contact area that enhances stability while being manufacturable through standard molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the top surface of feet is made convex for stable stacking, then storage efficiency is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking efficiencyVSAvoidfoot geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The convex top surface of each foot is designed to nest within the concave bottom surface of feet on boards stacked above it. This nesting arrangement creates stable vertical stacking configurations with airspace between boards, maximizing storage efficiency while using simple geometric forms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If feet extend beyond all edges to prevent surface contact, then food safety is improved, but the area occupied by the board increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination preventionVSAvoidfootprint area
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of expanding the entire board surface, only four discrete feet at the corners extend beyond the edges. This segmented approach provides contamination prevention while minimizing the additional footprint area, as the feet are concentrated at specific locations rather than distributed across the entire surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively prevents cross-contamination, enhances food safety, and allows for efficient drying and space-saving storage configurations by maintaining an airspace between the board and surfaces, reducing the risk of re-contamination and improving aesthetics.

Implementation Method 1

the lower surface of each of the feet is concave and supple to better form a non-slip contact with the counter upon which the cutting board is being used

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The top surface of each of the feet is convex to complement the concavity of the upper surface so that boards can stack in a stable configuration with airspace between boards

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric nesting: Nesting

Data Source

PatentEP3829404B1Cutting board
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 HUGO EDGAR
  • EP3829404B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3829404B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP3829404B1 patent drawingFigure 7~8

AI summary

A rectangular cutting board (12) having a foot (14) at each corner. Each foot (14) extends above and below the board (12). Each foot (14) extends beyond each adjacent edge (23, 24, 25, 27) so that in any orientation of the board on a flat surface (26) no part of the board touches the counter. The feet (14) each have an edge perpendicular to the surface (20) of the cutting board (12) to stand the board vertically for drying or storage. The bottom of the feet (18) are concave and the top of the feet (16) are convex. When multiple similarly sized boards are horizontally stacked the bottom side of the feet compliment and nest into the top of the feet of the cutting board below.