Cutting Device With Self-Aligning Gilmoid Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cutting tools with randomly oriented cutting elements suffer from disparities in height and angle, leading to inefficient cutting operations due to the lack of preferred angles for optimal cutting efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method and device where cutting elements are stacked and attached to a cutter surface such that a modified gilmoid with a support protruding from one plane-defined-surface forms an angle of 35 to 55 degrees with the surface, ensuring stable positioning and consistent orientation for efficient cutting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If cutting elements are adhered with random orientations, then the manufacturing process is simple and fast, but the cutting efficiency deteriorates due to disparities in heights and angles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting efficiencyVSAvoidelement orientation control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting elements are pre-formed with specific geometric features (flat surfaces, angles, and configurations) that enable them to self-align and stack in predetermined orientations. This preliminary preparation of the elements allows them to automatically achieve the desired cutting angles and heights when stacked, eliminating the need for complex post-assembly orientation control while maintaining high cutting efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Each cutting element is designed with non-uniform local characteristics, including specific flat surfaces at predetermined angles, varying heights, and asymmetric geometries. These local quality variations enable each element to contribute differently to the overall cutting structure, allowing the stack to achieve consistent optimal cutting angles across all elements while maintaining manufacturing simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If cutting elements are precisely formed using machining and molding, then the shape consistency is improved, but the manufacturing cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelement shape consistencyVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The precise shaping and forming operations are performed on cutting elements during their initial manufacturing stage, before assembly. Each element is pre-formed with the exact geometry needed for its final position in the stack, including predetermined angles and flat surfaces. This eliminates the need for time-consuming post-assembly adjustments or orientations, reducing total manufacturing time while maintaining high precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting tool is divided into multiple discrete cutting elements that can be independently manufactured with precise geometries. Each segment (cutting element) is formed separately with specific shapes and angles, then assembled by stacking. This segmentation allows parallel manufacturing of multiple elements, reducing total production time while maintaining individual element precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If cutting elements are stacked with consistent angles, then the cutting efficiency is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional positioning features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting efficiencyVSAvoidstacking structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Cutting elements are designed with asymmetric geometries, including non-uniform heights, angled flat surfaces, and irregular shapes. This asymmetry enables each element to naturally orient itself at the correct angle when stacked, with the gravity and geometric interlocking providing automatic positioning. The asymmetric design eliminates the need for complex mechanical positioning mechanisms while achieving consistent optimal cutting angles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting elements incorporate self-aligning features such as flat surfaces at predetermined angles and complementary geometric profiles that enable automatic orientation during stacking. The elements self-position themselves without requiring external positioning devices, fixtures, or complex assembly mechanisms. This self-service capability achieves consistent cutting angles while minimizing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a stable and repeatable cutting device with consistent angles, enhancing cutting efficiency, reliability, and durability by maintaining sharp cutting edges and facilitating a more predictable cutting process.

Implementation Method 1

the three elements being sized and shaped such that prior to attachment to the cutter surface the three elements are restable in a stable manner on the cutter surface due to gravity alone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9493992B2Cutting device and method of making
Publication Date: 2016.11.15 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US9493992B2 patent drawing
  • US9493992B2 patent drawing
  • US9493992B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cutting device includes, at least one stack of cutting elements attached to a cutter surface having, a first element and a second element attached to the cutter surface. A third element is attached to the first element and the second element. The three elements are sized and shaped such that prior to attachment to the cutter surface the three elements are restable in a stable manner on the cutter surface due to gravity alone. A plane-defined-surface defined by one of the two planes of a modified gilmoid of the third element positioned further from the cutter surface is oriented at an angle of about 35 to 55 degrees relative to the cutter surface.