Cutting Insert Abutment Ridge Geometry Against Torque Rotation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting tools with planar peripheral contacts between the cutting insert and insert holder suffer from rotational displacement due to torque, leading to reduced precision and increased vibration during metalworking operations.

Innovation Solution

The cutting insert features converging peripheral abutment ridges on its rear and lower surfaces, which engage with corresponding abutment surfaces in the insert pocket, providing a secure, non-planar contact that stabilizes the insert and reduces rotational displacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If planar peripheral contact between cutting insert and insert holder is used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but rotational displacement occurs due to torque leading to reduced precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curvature by replacing the planar peripheral contact surfaces with arc-shaped abutment ridges on the cutting insert that engage with corresponding arc-shaped abutment surfaces in the insert holder. This curved geometry creates a non-planar contact interface that resists rotational displacement while maintaining manufacturability through standardized arc profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The peripheral contact interface is segmented into discrete abutment ridges positioned at specific locations around the cutting insert perimeter. These segmented contact points are strategically placed to maximize resistance against torque-induced rotation while simplifying the overall structure compared to a continuous curved surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If planar peripheral contact is used, then device complexity is reduced, but stability against rotational displacement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The curved abutment ridges and surfaces create a geometric interlock that passively resists rotational forces without requiring additional active components. The arc-shaped geometry naturally converts rotational torque into radial compressive forces, enhancing stability while maintaining simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The abutment ridges are positioned asymmetrically at optimized locations around the cutting insert perimeter, creating uneven contact distribution that maximizes resistance against rotational displacement. This asymmetric arrangement provides enhanced stability with minimal structural modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Productivity

If cutting depth is increased, then productivity is improved, but vibration increases leading to reduced surface finish quality

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidsurface finish
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The curved abutment interface provides continuous contact and support during deep cutting operations, damping vibrations through the geometric constraint. The arc-shaped ridges maintain stable engagement with the holder even under increased cutting depths, preventing the insert from vibrating or rotating during the cutting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of trying to reduce cutting depth to eliminate vibration, the patent inverts the approach by enhancing the mechanical constraint through curved abutment surfaces. This inverted strategy allows deep cuts to be made stable by improving the insert-holder interface geometry rather than limiting the cutting parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentEP3600733B1Cutting insert having two peripheral abutment ridges and cutting tool
Publication Date: 2022.11.16 ISCAR LTD
  • EP3600733B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3600733B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3600733B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A cutting insert includes an insert longitudinal axis defining a forward to rear direction, opposing insert inner and outer side surfaces and an insert peripheral surface extending therebetween. The insert peripheral surface includes an insert rear end surface and an adjacent insert lower surface. The cutting insert includes two spaced apart peripheral abutment ridges that are distal the insert outer side surface and extend along the insert rear end surface and the insert lower surface, respectively. The two peripheral abutment ridges converge towards each other at an acute insert wedge angle in a rearward direction of the cutting insert, away from a cutting edge.