Cutting Insert Asymmetry for Symmetric Edge Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing indexable cutting inserts with multiple cutting edges face challenges in maintaining symmetry and freewheeling properties without complex twisting, leading to high production costs and potential collisions during machining.

Innovation Solution

A cutting insert design featuring two identical base surfaces and two identical main side surfaces, with secondary side surfaces incorporating projections to form clearance angles, allowing main cutting edges to run parallel and ensuring symmetry and freewheeling without twisting, thus simplifying manufacturing and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If indexable cutting inserts with multiple cutting edges are designed with symmetry properties to enable rotation and reuse, then the inserts can be used multiple times without loss of machining accuracy, but the design becomes more complex and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice life of cutting insertVSAvoidcomplexity of insert design
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by intentionally designing the cutting insert with non-symmetric features, specifically offsetting the secondary cutting edges relative to the main cutting edges. This asymmetric arrangement allows the insert to be used only once for each main cutting edge (totaling four uses) while maintaining simple manufacturing. The non-symmetric design prevents the need for complex twisted geometries that would otherwise be required to achieve symmetry, thus resolving the contradiction between extended service life and design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Adaptability or versatility

If the cutting insert is designed with twisted geometry to achieve symmetry and freewheeling properties, then the cutting edges can be reused after rotation, but the manufacturing process becomes technically challenging and production costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereusability of cutting insertVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent deliberately employs asymmetric design to avoid the manufacturing challenges of twisted geometry. By offsetting secondary cutting edges and using planar surfaces instead of twisted surfaces, the insert achieves reusability through a simpler geometric configuration that is easier to manufacture while maintaining the essential functionality of multiple cutting edge utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting insert is segmented into distinct functional zones: main cutting edges for primary material removal and secondary cutting edges for finishing work. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall manufacturing process by avoiding the need for complex integrated twisted surfaces, thereby reducing production costs while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the main cutting edges are arranged symmetrically to allow 180° rotation, then the same insert can be used four times, but ensuring that unused cutting edges do not collide with the workpiece becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of times insert can be usedVSAvoidcollision between insert and workpiece
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric offset of secondary cutting edges relative to main cutting edges creates a geometric configuration where unused cutting edges are naturally positioned away from the workpiece during machining operations. This asymmetric arrangement prevents collisions without requiring complex anti-collision mechanisms, allowing the insert to be safely reused four times while maintaining machining integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP2897752B1Cutting insert and tool for macining a workpiece
Publication Date: 2019.04.03 HARTMETALL WERKZEUGFAB PAUL HORN
  • EP2897752B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2897752B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6
  • EP2897752B1 patent drawingFigure 7~8

AI summary

The invention relates to a cutting insert for a workpiece machining tool, comprising: two identical opposite base surfaces (14a, b), at least a portion of which runs perpendicular to a z axis of the cutting insert (10, 20), two identical opposite main lateral surfaces (16a, b) which extend between the two base surfaces (14a, b) and at least a portion of each of which runs perpendicular to an x axis of the cutting insert (10, 20), and two identical opposite secondary lateral surfaces (18a, b) which also extend between the two base surfaces (14a, b) and at least a portion of each of which runs perpendicular to a y axis of the cutting insert (10, 20), the x axis, y axis, and z axis being mutually perpendicular main axes of the cutting insert (10, 20). A main blade (12a-d) is provided between each base surface (14a, b) and each main lateral surface (16a, b), and each main lateral surface (16a, b) has two diagonally opposite first partial blades (26a-d), each of which adjoins a first end (28a-d) of the respective main blade (12a-d). The main blades (12a-d) and the first partial blades (26a-d) of each main lateral surface (16a, b) each lie in a blade plane that runs perpendicular to the x axis. Finally, the first partial blades (26a-d) are each formed on a first projection (24a-d) that is provided on the secondary lateral surfaces (18a, b) and defines a first clearance angle (α).