Cutting Insert Recess Mounting for Stable Profile Turning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing profile turning tools face challenges in securely clamping cutting inserts to the tool holder, leading to undesirable relative movements and suboptimal machining quality, particularly for indexable inserts with multiple cutting edges.

Innovation Solution

A tool design featuring a cutting insert with a horizontal arrangement and a recessed mounting system, including a holder-side and insert-side support and bearing surfaces, ensures a stable insert seat and allows for indexable use of multiple cutting edges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional clamping system is used for cutting inserts, then the insert can be secured to the tool holder, but relative movements occur during machining leading to poor machining quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining qualityVSAvoidrelative movement between insert and holder
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping system is segmented into multiple independent bearing surfaces (first, second, third bearing surfaces) that distribute clamping forces across different contact points. This segmentation prevents relative movement by creating multiple constraint points between the cutting insert and tool holder, thereby improving machining quality and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple bearing surfaces are merged into a unified clamping structure where the first, second, and third bearing surfaces work together as an integrated system. This merging creates a stable insert seat that eliminates relative movements during machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Quantity of substance

If vertical cutting inserts are used for large cutting widths, then cutting capacity is increased, but carbide consumption becomes extremely high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting width capacityVSAvoidcarbide consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting insert is reoriented from a vertical arrangement to a horizontal arrangement on the tool holder. This dimensional change allows large cutting widths to be achieved without increasing the insert's height in the vertical direction, thereby reducing carbide consumption while maintaining cutting capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The orientation parameter of the cutting insert is changed from vertical to horizontal positioning. This parameter change enables the same cutting width capacity to be achieved with reduced material consumption, as the insert utilizes its surface area more efficiently in the horizontal plane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Volume of moving object

If horizontal cutting inserts are used for internal bore machining, then space requirements are reduced, but the clamping stability must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace requirement for bore machiningVSAvoidclamping stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping interface is segmented into multiple bearing surfaces distributed across the horizontal insert structure. This segmentation provides sufficient clamping stability in the constrained space of internal bore machining by creating multiple contact points that distribute mechanical loads effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The horizontal cutting insert design with multiple bearing surfaces serves multiple functions: it reduces the vertical profile for confined bore machining spaces while simultaneously providing stable clamping through distributed contact surfaces. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction between space reduction and stability maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260027626A1Tool and method for machining a workpiece
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 HARTMETALL WERKZEUGFAB PAUL HORN
  • US20260027626A1 patent drawing
  • US20260027626A1 patent drawing
  • US20260027626A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A tool for machining a workpiece includes a tool holder, which extends along a holder longitudinal axis, and a cutting insert, which can be mounted on the tool holder with a mounting element. An extension is arranged on the cutting insert and projects from a support surface on the cutting insert. The extension, when in the mounted state of the tool, engages in a recess provided on the tool holder. The recess is formed in a support surface on the holder. Three insert-side bearing surfaces, which are arranged transversely to one another, are arranged laterally on the extension and two of them, in the mounted state of the tool, rest against two holder-side bearing surfaces, which form side walls of the recess. In the mounted state of the tool, the cutting insert rests with its insert-side support surface against the holder-side support surface of the tool holder.