Vertically Mounted Cutting Insert Ridges for Breakage Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vertically mounted cutting inserts experience breakage and instability due to radial cutting resistance, thin mounting holes, and sharp included angles, which lead to weakened edges and increased chip abrasion on restraint surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A vertically mounted cutting insert design featuring a reinforcing portion with integrated projecting ridges that extend between rake faces and the restraint surface, enhancing rigidity and separating cutting edges from the restraint surface to prevent chip abrasion, while optimizing the placement of reinforcing elements to maintain stability and reduce stress concentrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a vertically mounted insert is used with a mounting hole extending through the peripheral side surface, then the insert can be mounted vertically, but the fastening screw is bent in the radial direction due to radial cutting resistance, leading to larger mounting hole inner diameter and thinner portion between upper surface and mounting hole

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertical mounting capabilityVSAvoidresistance to breakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The insert is divided into multiple functional surfaces: upper surface with cutting edges, lower surface with restraint surface, and peripheral side surface with mounting hole. The reinforcing portion is segmented into first, second, and third projecting ridges that extend from the restraint surface toward the upper surface, providing localized reinforcement without compromising vertical mounting capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The insert employs a composite structure combining the cutting portion (upper surface with cutting edges and rake faces) and the restraint portion (lower surface with restraint surface and reinforcing portion). This composite design allows the insert to simultaneously achieve vertical mounting functionality and enhanced resistance to breakage through the integrated reinforcing ridges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Area of stationary object

If the upper and lower surfaces are smaller in size due to no mounting hole in vertically mounted insert, then the included angle becomes sharp, but the strength of edge deteriorates and cutting edge is more likely to be chipped

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface sizeVSAvoidedge strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcing portion is formed by adding a new dimension to the insert structure - the third projecting ridge extends in the thickness direction from the restraint surface toward the upper surface. This dimensional addition reinforces the sharp included angle region without increasing the planar surface area, thereby maintaining the compact vertical mounting geometry while improving edge strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing ridges are strategically positioned to provide localized reinforcement at critical stress points. The first and second projecting ridges extend along the boundaries between the rake faces and restraint surface, while the third projecting ridge connects them, creating localized strength enhancement precisely where the sharp included angle makes the cutting edges vulnerable to chipping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If chip flies out and abrades the rake face, then chip may reach the restraint surface and roughen it, but this causes unstable restraint state when cutting insert is turned upside down

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestraint stabilityVSAvoidchip abrasion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The first and second projecting ridges act as intermediary barriers between the rake faces and the restraint surface. These ridges intercept chips that fly out from the cutting edges, preventing them from reaching and abrading the restraint surface. This intermediary structure maintains the reliability of the restraint state by protecting the restraint surface from chip contamination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing portion is segmented into multiple projecting ridges that create separate protective zones. The first projecting ridge protects one rake face boundary, the second projecting ridge protects the other rake face boundary, and the third projecting ridge connects them, forming a segmented barrier system that effectively blocks chip paths to the restraint surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4043131A1Cutting insert
Publication Date: 2022.08.17 TUNGALOY CORP
  • EP4043131A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4043131A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4043131A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Provided is a cutting insert which is resistant to breakage and can stably be restrained. A cutting insert (2) configured as a vertically mounted insert has a first rake face (11R) adjacent to a first major cutting edge (11), a second rake face (14R) adjacent to a second major cutting edge (14), a restraint surface (19) located further inward than the first and second rake faces to come into contact with a tool body (3) when a second end surface (20) is used, and a reinforcing portion (40) projecting from the restraint surface. The reinforcing portion has a third projecting ridge (43) provided to extend between the first and second rake faces and halve the restraint surface, a first projecting ridge (41) connected to one end (431) of the third projecting ridge to extend so as to cover at least a portion of a boundary (B41) between the first rake face and the restraint surface, and a second projecting ridge (42) connected to another end (432) of the third projecting ridge so as to cover at least a portion of a boundary (B42) between the second rake face and the restraint surface.