Cutting Spindle Anomaly Detection from Power-Based State Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cutting machines with electrically driven spindles face challenges in detecting anomalies, particularly in determining when a spindle needs replacement, as existing methods require information about whether the spindle is cutting or idling, and often result in inaccurate predictions due to limited data availability.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines electric power consumption during working cycles, divides cycles into time windows, and uses Gaussian Mixture Models to differentiate between cutting and idling operations, calculating median and expected deviations to detect anomalies, allowing for precise identification of impending spindle failure without prior knowledge of spindle status.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional machine learning methods are used to detect spindle anomalies, then anomaly detection capability is provided, but the method requires information about whether the spindle is cutting or idling which is often unavailable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection capabilityVSAvoidmissing operational status information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the electric power consumption data itself to automatically determine the operational status (cutting or idling) of the spindle, eliminating the need for external status information. The method compares power values against learned patterns to self-identify operational modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The method transforms the unavailable operational status information into a derivable parameter by analyzing electric power consumption patterns. By monitoring changes in power values and comparing them against learned distributions, the system infers operational status from the power parameter itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If spindle replacement is performed based on conventional anomaly detection, then spindle failure prevention is achieved, but production time is lost due to spindle replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespindle failure preventionVSAvoidproduction downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary anomaly detection and estimates remaining spindle life before actual failure occurs. By continuously monitoring power consumption patterns and comparing them against learned normal operation patterns, the system identifies deviations early and predicts remaining useful life, enabling scheduled maintenance during planned downtime rather than unexpected failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The method implements continuous feedback monitoring of electric power consumption during spindle operation. By constantly comparing actual power values against the learned normal distribution and detecting deviations, the system provides real-time feedback on spindle health status, enabling proactive maintenance decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If machine learning models are trained with limited operational data, then model training is feasible, but measurement precision for anomaly detection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training feasibilityVSAvoidanomaly detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The method segments the operational data into distinct operational modes (cutting and idling) based on power consumption patterns. By separating and analyzing each mode independently with its own learned distribution, the system achieves precise anomaly detection even with limited overall data, as each segment can be adequately characterized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method focuses on analyzing only the relevant portions of operational data corresponding to actual cutting or idling operations, rather than requiring complete operational status information. This partial action approach allows effective anomaly detection using only the power consumption data that is actually available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240375231A1Anomaly Detection for a Cutting Machine with an Electrically Driven Spindle
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 SIEMENS AG
  • US20240375231A1 patent drawing
  • US20240375231A1 patent drawing
  • US20240375231A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for anomaly detection in a cutting machine with a spindle that is driven by an electric motor, wherein the method includes determining an electric power consumption of the motor during a working cycle of the machine, dividing the working cycle into time windows, determining, for each time window, whether the spindle was cutting and/or idling based on associated electric power values, determining median and expected deviation of electric power values for cutting and idling operation over the sequence of time windows, and determining an anomaly if electric power values during cutting or idling exceed a predetermined relationship to the corresponding median and expected deviation values.