Cutting Tool Coating Interface for Peeling-Resistant Adhesion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surface-coated cutting tools face issues with adhesiveness between the substrate and the coating film, leading to reduced tool lifetime when cutting difficult materials like stainless steel or Inconel, due to intermediate layers that introduce residual stress and peeling.

Innovation Solution

A surface-coated cutting tool with an intermediate layer containing carbides, nitrides, or carbonitrides that include elements from both the substrate and the upper base layer, enhancing chemical affinity and adhesiveness, and a TiN upper base layer for improved wear resistance and peeling resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an intermediate layer is provided between the substrate and coating film to improve adhesiveness, then adhesiveness between substrate and coating film is improved, but residual stress is introduced and peeling occurs during cutting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesiveness between substrate and coating filmVSAvoidresidual stress and peeling resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the compositional parameters of the intermediate layer by incorporating specific elements (Ti, Al, Cr, Si) in controlled ratios, and optimizes the thickness parameter to 1-10 nm. This parameter optimization allows the intermediate layer to provide adequate adhesiveness while minimizing residual stress and preventing peeling during cutting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite intermediate layer structure that combines multiple elements (Ti, Al, Cr, Si) with the substrate and coating film materials. This composite approach allows the intermediate layer to simultaneously provide chemical affinity for both substrate and coating film while maintaining mechanical strength and reducing residual stress through synergistic material interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If intermediate layer thickness is increased to improve adhesiveness, then adhesiveness between substrate and coating film is improved, but interlayer peeling occurs during cutting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesiveness between substrate and coating filmVSAvoidtool lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the thickness parameter of the intermediate layer to a specific range of 1-10 nm. This precise parameter control ensures that the intermediate layer is thick enough to provide necessary adhesiveness and stress buffering, yet thin enough to prevent interlayer peeling and maintain tool lifetime during prolonged cutting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If metal intermediate layer is used to improve adhesiveness, then adhesiveness between substrate and coating film is improved, but hardness and oxidation resistance of coating film are adversely affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesiveness between substrate and coating filmVSAvoidhardness and oxidation resistance of coating film
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces pure metal intermediate layers with a composite intermediate layer containing multiple elements (Ti, Al, Cr, Si) in specific ratios. This composite structure provides the necessary adhesiveness through chemical affinity while preventing the adverse effects on coating film hardness and oxidation resistance that occur with metal intermediate layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different material compositions to different functional requirements: the intermediate layer contains elements optimized for adhesiveness and stress management, while the coating film maintains its hardness and oxidation resistance properties. This local quality differentiation allows each layer to optimize its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides excellent adhesiveness between the substrate and coating film, enabling the tool to withstand severe cutting conditions and extend its lifetime by suppressing peeling and residual stress.

Implementation Method 1

continuous crystal lattices between the intermediate layer and the stack portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystal lattice continuity:

Implementation Method 2

adhesiveness between the substrate and the coating film is improved by continuous crystal lattices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical affinity: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

residual stress tends to be introduced, and interlayer peeling starting from the intermediate layer tends to occur during cutting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress distribution:

Data Source

PatentEP3552741B1Surface coated cutting tool
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC HARDMETAL CORP
  • EP3552741B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3552741B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3552741B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A surface-coated cutting tool includes a substrate composed of cemented carbide and a coating film. The coating film includes an intermediate layer in contact with the substrate and an upper layer formed on the intermediate layer. The upper layer is made up of a single layer consisting of an upper base layer which is a layer in contact with the intermediate layer or multiple layers constituted of two or more layers including the upper base layer. The substrate has a hexagonal crystal system. The intermediate layer and the upper base layer have an NaCl crystal structure. The intermediate layer has a thickness not smaller than 3 nm and not greater than 10 nm. A mismatch in lattice interplanar spacing in an interface region between the substrate and the intermediate layer is not higher than 65% of a theoretical value of a mismatch in lattice interplanar spacing between the substrate and the upper base layer. A mismatch in lattice interplanar spacing in an interface region between the intermediate layer and the upper base layer is not higher than 65% of the theoretical value of the mismatch in lattice interplanar spacing between the substrate and the upper base layer.