Automated Cutting Unit Control for Irregular Harvesting Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing self-propelled agricultural harvesters face challenges in efficiently adapting to non-standardized harvesting process situations, leading to crop losses and operational inefficiencies due to manual operator intervention being insufficient for real-time adjustments.

Innovation Solution

An automated cutting unit with a driver assistance system that autonomously adjusts cutting unit parameters based on detected harvesting process situations, overriding predefined strategies when necessary to optimize operations and prevent losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual operator intervention is used for adjusting cutting unit parameters, then the system remains simple and easy to operate, but the system cannot adapt in real-time to non-standardized harvesting situations, leading to crop losses and operational inefficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to non-standardized harvesting situationsVSAvoidmanual operator intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting unit is equipped with an automated control system that includes sensors for detecting crop conditions, a computing unit for processing sensor data, and actuators for automatically adjusting cutting parameters. The system monitors harvesting conditions in real-time and autonomously modifies cutting depth, speed, and other parameters without requiring manual operator intervention, thereby achieving real-time adaptability while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated control systems are implemented for real-time adjustments, then crop losses are minimized and operational efficiency is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidautomated control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated control system is designed with multi-functional components that serve multiple purposes. The computing unit processes data from various sensors and controls multiple cutting parameters simultaneously. The sensor array detects different crop conditions and translates them into appropriate control actions. This integration of multiple functions into unified components achieves high productivity while managing device complexity through functional consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If predefined harvesting strategies are used, then the control system is simple and reliable, but the system cannot respond to unexpected or non-standardized harvesting process situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to non-standardized situationsVSAvoidcontrol system reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor harvesting conditions, the computing unit compares actual conditions against predefined strategies, and actuators automatically adjust parameters when deviations are detected. This feedback mechanism enables the system to respond to non-standardized situations by dynamically modifying cutting parameters while maintaining reliability through systematic decision-making algorithms that evaluate sensor data against established harvesting protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12490670B2Self-propelled agricultural harvester and method for operating a self-propelled agricultural harvester
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 CLAAS SELBSTFAHRENDE ERNTEMASCHINEN GMBH
  • US12490670B2 patent drawing
  • US12490670B2 patent drawing
  • US12490670B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a self-propelled agricultural harvester with a cutting unit and a self-propelled agricultural harvester are disclosed. A driver assistance system associated with the agricultural harvester includes a memory that saves data and a computing unit for processing data saved in the memory. The driver assistance system and the cutting unit form an automated cutting unit. A harvesting process strategy is selected from a plurality of harvesting process strategies saved in the memory and at least one cutting unit parameter is selected. The at least one cutting unit parameter may be determined autonomously by the computing unit to implement the at least one selected harvesting process strategy and may be specified to the cutting unit. While the automated cutting unit is being controlled according to the selected harvesting process strategy, responsive to detecting a harvesting process situation on a field to be worked, with the harvesting process situation indicative of deviating from the at least one harvesting process strategy, regulation sequences, which temporarily override the execution of the harvesting process strategy, are executed.