Propeller Shaft CV Joint Cage Offset for Size and Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing plunging type constant velocity universal joints for propeller shafts face challenges in achieving size reduction and weight reduction while maintaining performance, especially in meeting demands for improved fuel efficiency and increased rotation speed.

Innovation Solution

The design of a plunging type constant velocity universal joint dedicated to propeller shafts, featuring a reduced maximum operating angle of 15° or less, optimized component dimensions, and a cage with reduced offset, to achieve size and weight reduction while maintaining torque transmission efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the maximum operating angle of the DOJ is limited to a low value (15° or less) for propeller shaft applications, then radial size and weight can be reduced by reducing wall thickness of components, but the versatility and adaptability of the joint are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of DOJVSAvoidoperating angle range
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by optimizing specific geometric parameters (offset ratio f/PCDBALL between 0.05-0.10, track groove angles, pocket positions) for the specific application condition of small operating angles, rather than designing for a wide range of angles. This localized optimization enables weight reduction while maintaining performance for propeller shaft applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key geometric parameters from conventional values: reduces offset ratio to 0.05-0.10 (conventionally higher), reduces wall thickness of outer joint member, inner joint member, and cage, and optimizes track groove angles. These parameter changes enable size and weight reduction specifically for small operating angle applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Volume of moving object

If the offset of the cage is reduced to achieve further size and weight reduction, then the technical effects of size reduction are enhanced, but the structural strength and load-bearing capacity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume of DOJVSAvoidstructural strength of cage
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite material construction for the cage, combining materials with different properties to achieve both reduced offset (for compactness) and maintained strength. The outer joint member, inner joint member, and cage use optimized material compositions that provide high strength-to-weight ratio, enabling the reduced offset design (f/PCDBALL: 0.05-0.10) to maintain structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes spherical geometry for the cage structure and ball contacts, where the curved surfaces distribute loads more evenly across the contact areas. This spherical design allows for reduced offset while maintaining strength, as the curved geometry naturally handles stress concentrations better than sharp corners or flat surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Reliability

If axial pocket clearance and axial clearance are provided to improve life and reduce sliding resistance, then durability and rotation speed capability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice life of DOJVSAvoidclearance specification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates preliminary action by pre-establishing specific clearance values during manufacturing: axial pocket clearance δ1 between 0-0.050mm and axial clearance δ2 between 0.5-1.5mm. These clearances are built into the design from the start, allowing the joint to accommodate thermal expansion, manufacturing tolerances, and wear, thereby extending service life and enabling higher rotation speeds without requiring complex adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12203510B2Plunging type constant velocity universal joint for propeller shaft
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 NTN CORP
  • US12203510B2 patent drawing
  • US12203510B2 patent drawing
  • US12203510B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plunging type constant velocity universal joint 1 for a propeller shaft includes an outer joint member 2, an inner joint member 3, eight torque transmidetting balls 4, and a cage 5. A center of curvature O1 of a spherical outer surface 12 and a center of curvature O2 of a spherical inner surface 13 of the cage 5 each have an equal and axially opposite offset (f) with respect to a center O3 of pockets 5a. A ratio f/PCDBALL between the offset (f) of the cage 5 and a pitch circle diameter (PCDBALL) of the torque transmitting balls 4 is 0.07 or more and 0.09 or less.