Constant Velocity Joint Cage Structure for Longer Plunging Travel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional constant velocity joint assemblies face challenges in achieving increased plunging distance without compromising strength, durability, and cost efficiency, leading to heavier and more expensive designs.

Innovation Solution

A joint assembly design featuring a cage member with adjustable engagement portions and a grease cover that allows for varying plunging distances, enabling customizable and cost-effective solutions while maintaining strength and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If the windows in the cage are increased in size to increase plunging distance, then the plunging distance is improved, but the amount of material between windows decreases which reduces strength and durability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplunging distanceVSAvoidcage strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The cage is divided into multiple segments or sections with reinforcement ribs strategically positioned to provide structural support. This segmentation allows the windows to be larger for increased plunging distance while the ribs maintain cage strength by dividing the structure into load-bearing sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcement ribs are added to specific localized areas of the cage where structural support is needed most. This allows the cage to have varying wall thicknesses - thinner in non-critical areas to allow larger windows for plunging, and thicker with ribs in critical areas to maintain overall strength and durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the diameters of various components are increased to provide a cage with desired strength for larger plunging distance, then the strength and durability are improved, but the assembly becomes heavier and has increased packaging size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage strengthVSAvoidjoint assembly weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly increasing the diameter of all cage components, reinforcement ribs are strategically placed only in the specific areas where additional strength is required. This localized reinforcement provides the necessary structural support for larger plunging distance while minimizing the overall increase in component diameters and resulting weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cage structure is segmented with reinforcement ribs that provide strength where needed without requiring a complete increase in overall component diameters. This segmented approach to strengthening allows the assembly to maintain lighter weight compared to a uniform thickening of all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Length of moving object

If the diameters of various components are increased to accommodate larger plunging distance, then the plunging distance is improved, but the packaging size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplunging distanceVSAvoidpackaging size
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Reinforcement ribs are added locally to the cage structure rather than increasing the overall outer dimensions of the cage. This allows the cage to accommodate larger plunging distances internally while maintaining the same external packaging footprint, as the ribs are internal structural features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Length of moving object

If conventional cage designs are used to achieve larger plunging distance, then the plunging distance is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplunging distanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cage is designed with segmentation features and reinforcement ribs that can be efficiently manufactured using standard injection molding techniques. The segmented design with ribs allows for larger plunging distance while utilizing conventional manufacturing processes, avoiding the need for expensive custom fabrication methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11542988B2Constant velocity joint assembly and method thereof
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 DANA AUTOMOTIVE SYST GRP LLC
  • US11542988B2 patent drawing
  • US11542988B2 patent drawing
  • US11542988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A joint assembly and method of utilizing the same. The joint assembly includes a first joint member drivingly connected to a second joint member by using one or more third joint members. At least a portion of a cage member is interposed between the first and second joint members. When the first joint member is plunged in a first direction, at least a portion of one or more first engagement portions of the first joint member are in direct contact with at least a portion of one or more first engagement portions of the cage member. When the first joint member is plunged in a second direction, opposite the first direction, at least a portion of one or more second engagement portions of the first joint member are in direct contact with at least a portion of one or more second engagement portions of the cage member.