Computer Vision Reliability Model Sensitivity Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computer vision models in automotive systems face challenges in reliably processing visual data due to high variance in performance across different visual parameters, making it difficult to ensure safety and reliability, especially in conditions like glare from the sun, which can obscure road signs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for generating reliability indication data using a computer vision reliability model that performs sensitivity analysis during training to identify critical visual parameters, allowing for online monitoring and detection of unreliable conditions, thereby providing a safety monitor that alerts systems when the model is likely to perform unreliably.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If computer vision models are used in automotive systems, then automated visual processing capability is improved, but reliability under varying visual conditions deteriorates due to high performance variance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated visual processing capabilityVSAvoidmodel performance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs sensitivity analysis during the training phase to identify critical visual parameters before deployment. This preliminary action enables the model to learn which parameters (such as sun angle, illumination conditions) most affect performance, allowing for proactive reliability assessment during operation without requiring retraining or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors visual parameters during operation and provides feedback about reliability conditions to the autonomous system. By comparing current visual parameters against the sensitivity analysis results, the system can alert operators or adjust operations when unreliable conditions are detected, creating a closed-loop reliability monitoring system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If comprehensive testing of computer vision models is performed, then reliability assessment is improved, but testing complexity and time requirements increase due to large input space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability assessment accuracyVSAvoidtesting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses only on the most critical visual parameters that affect model performance, identified through sensitivity analysis during training. Instead of testing all possible visual conditions comprehensively, the system isolates and monitors only the parameters with highest impact (such as sun angle, illumination), significantly reducing testing complexity while maintaining reliable assessment of critical conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach from testing all possible input combinations to monitoring specific parameter variations that matter most. By transforming the testing problem into parameter-space analysis, the system can assess reliability across the full input space more efficiently by understanding which parameter changes drive performance degradation rather than exhaustively testing every combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If sensitivity analysis is performed during training, then online reliability monitoring capability is improved, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveonline reliability monitoring capabilityVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the sensitivity analysis function with the existing training process rather than performing it separately. By integrating sensitivity analysis into training, the model learns reliability information concurrently with visual processing capabilities, eliminating the need for separate analysis phases and reducing overall training time while enabling online reliability monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240046614A1Computer-implemented method for generating reliability indications for computer vision
Publication Date: 2024.02.08 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20240046614A1 patent drawing
  • US20240046614A1 patent drawing
  • US20240046614A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for generating reliability indication data of a computer vision model. The method includes: obtaining visual data including an input image or sequence representing an observed scene, the visual data being characterizable by a first set of visual parameters; analysing the observed scene in the visual data using a computer vision reliability model sensitive to a second set of visual parameters, the second set of visual parameters includes a subset of the first set of visual parameters, and is obtained from the first set of visual parameters according to a sensitivity analysis applied to a plurality of parameters in the first set of visual parameters, the sensitivity analysis is performed during an offline training phase of the computer vision reliability model; generating reliability indication data of the observed scene using the analysis of the observed scene; and outputting the reliability indication data of the computer vision model.