Multi-Step CVD Cleaning for Graphite Susceptor Durability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for cleaning CVD reactors, particularly those using Cl2, are inefficient in removing parasitic coatings and carbon residues from graphite parts, which can lead to suboptimal deposition processes and equipment durability issues.

Innovation Solution

A multi-step cleaning process is implemented in a CVD reactor with a graphite susceptor coated in SiC, utilizing sequential injection of halogen-based gases like Cl2 and O2 at controlled temperatures to convert and remove parasitic coatings, followed by a hydrogen bake to ensure thorough cleaning and equipment conditioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If Cl2 is used to remove parasitic coatings from graphite parts, then cleaning effectiveness is improved, but the graphite parts suffer from chlorine attack and durability issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidgraphite part durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of Cl2 on graphite into a beneficial cleaning mechanism by using SiC-coated graphite parts. The SiC coating resists Cl2 attack while still allowing effective cleaning of parasitic coatings through controlled chemical reactions, thus protecting the graphite substrate from degradation while maintaining cleaning effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies a SiC coating layer on the graphite part to create a composite structure. This composite material combines the cleaning effectiveness needed for removing parasitic coatings with the chemical resistance required to withstand Cl2 exposure, solving the contradiction between cleaning efficiency and durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If multiple cleaning steps are implemented, then removal of parasitic coatings is improved, but process time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval efficiency of parasitic coatingsVSAvoidcleaning process duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning process is divided into multiple sequential steps with different purposes: first removing parasitic coatings, then removing carbon residues, and finally conditioning the surface. Each step uses specific gases and parameters optimized for its particular function, improving overall efficiency while managing process time through structured progression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous cleaning action through sequential gas injections and temperature maintenance. The process maintains elevated temperatures and continuous gas flow through multiple steps, ensuring uninterrupted removal of different coating types without idle time, thus improving removal efficiency while optimizing total process duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If carbon residues are present on graphite parts, then deposition quality is affected, but conventional cleaning methods are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition qualityVSAvoidcleaning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes in the cleaning process, specifically varying temperature and gas composition, to effectively remove carbon residues. By controlling temperature ranges and gas flow rates during different cleaning phases, the process achieves thorough removal of carbon deposits that conventional methods cannot handle, thereby improving deposition quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves efficient removal of parasitic coatings and carbon residues, enhancing the deposition process and extending the lifespan of graphite components by maintaining their Cl2 resistance, with etching rates of 80±20 μm/h and effective carbon oxide formation.

Implementation Method 1

a halogen or a halogen compound, is fed into the process chamber (2) in a first cleaning step (21)... in which a halogen or a halogen compound is fed into the process chamber (2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

O2 is fed into the process chamber (2) in a second cleaning step (22)... effective carbon oxide formation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

the process chamber (2) is heated to a first cleaning temperature (T1)... the process chamber (2) is brought to a second cleaning temperature (T2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 4

essentially only H2 is fed into the process chamber (2) in a third cleaning step (23)... after the third cleaning step (23), the process chamber (2) is cooled (24)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS20250019823A1Method and device for depositing a layer containing a group five element in a process chamber and subsequent cleaning of the process chamber
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 AIXTRON AG
  • US20250019823A1 patent drawing
  • US20250019823A1 patent drawing
  • US20250019823A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for depositing layers containing a group five element on a substrate, in which process gas is fed into a process chamber. After depositing the layer, the process chamber is cleaned as follows. The process chamber is heated to a first cleaning temperature. After reaching the first cleaning temperature, a halogen or a halogen compound is fed into the process chamber in a first cleaning step. After the first cleaning step, the process chamber is brought to a second cleaning temperature. After reaching the second cleaning temperature, O2 is fed into the process chamber in a second cleaning step. After the second cleaning step, the process chamber is brought to a third cleaning temperature. After reaching the third cleaning temperature, substantially only H2 is fed into the process chamber in a third cleaning step. After the third cleaning step, the process chamber is cooled.