CVD Film Defect Sampling With SEM Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional metrology techniques struggle to detect smaller defects in semiconductor films deposited by chemical vapor deposition (CVD), requiring increased focus and complexity, which can lead to longer inspection times and introduction of additional defects.

Innovation Solution

The use of scanning electron microscopy to sample defects in CVD films at multiple non-contiguous regions of the substrate, allowing for the detection of defects less than 10 nm in size without the need for additional layers to enlarge defects, and adjusting deposition parameters to reduce defect numbers in subsequent depositions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional metrology techniques are used to detect smaller defects, then measurement precision may be improved, but device complexity and inspection time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidmetrology system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical/optical metrology systems with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to detect sub-10 nm defects. The SEM system uses electron beams instead of optical systems, enabling detection of smaller defects without proportionally increasing system complexity. The automated defect sampling and classification further reduce operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automated defect sampling that inspects selected portions of the substrate rather than performing full exhaustive inspection. This partial action approach detects defects in critical areas while reducing overall inspection time and complexity, achieving adequate measurement precision without inspecting every point on the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If tighter focus is applied to detect smaller defects, then measurement precision improves, but inspection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated defect sampling on selected portions of the substrate rather than complete inspection. This allows tight focus on critical areas where defects are most likely to occur, achieving high measurement precision for sub-10 nm defects while reducing total inspection time by not examining every region of the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The defect classification system automatically categorizes detected defects by type and severity without requiring manual analysis. This self-service automation eliminates time-consuming manual inspection while maintaining high measurement precision, allowing the system to quickly process and classify multiple defects across sampled regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If additional layers are deposited to enlarge defects for detection, then measurement precision improves, but manufacturing complexity and additional defects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detectabilityVSAvoiddeposition process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses scanning electron microscopy to directly image and detect sub-10 nm defects in the as-deposited film without requiring additional enlargement layers. The high-resolution electron imaging capability eliminates the need for conventional defect enlargement techniques, reducing deposition process complexity and preventing introduction of additional defects from extra processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameter from optical methods to electron microscopy, which provides sufficient resolution to detect small defects directly. This parameter change in the detection method eliminates the need for physical enlargement of defects through additional material deposition, simplifying the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If real-time analysis is implemented to adjust deposition parameters, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect reduction capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time feedback by analyzing defect data from SEM imaging and automatically adjusting deposition parameters for subsequent films. The system monitors defect counts and characteristics, then modifies deposition conditions to reduce defects in next-layer films, achieving continuous improvement in manufacturing precision through automated closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The defect analysis and parameter adjustment system operates autonomously without requiring manual intervention. The automated classification and control system self-adjusts deposition parameters based on real-time defect data, reducing the need for complex manual control while maintaining high manufacturing precision through continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the accurate detection and analysis of small defects across a substrate, reducing the total number of defects in subsequent depositions by over 80%, and improving the surface roughness and overall quality of semiconductor films.

Implementation Method 1

scanning selected portions of the CVD material with scanning electron microscopy to detect defects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron Beam: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

depositing a film of semiconductor material on a substrate in a substrate processing chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Vapour Deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS12300554B2Systems and methods for analyzing defects in CVD films
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US12300554B2 patent drawing
  • US12300554B2 patent drawing
  • US12300554B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present technology may include semiconductor processing methods that include depositing a film of semiconductor material on a substrate in a substrate processing chamber. The deposited film may be sampled for defects at greater than or about two non-contiguous regions of the substrate with scanning electron microscopy. The defects that are detected and characterized may include those of a size less than or about 10 nm. The methods may further include calculating a total number of defects in the deposited film based on the sampling for defects in the greater than or about two non-contiguous regions of the substrate. At least one deposition parameter may be adjusted as a result of the calculation. The adjustment to the at least one deposition parameter may reduce the total number of defects in a deposition of the film of semiconductor material.