CVD Reactor Isolation Zones for Contamination Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reactor designs face challenges such as contamination from pyrolysis products condensing on reactor walls and ceilings, leading to particulate contamination of wafers and inefficient reactant usage, due to the condensation of AlGaAs, gallium, and arsenic species, which are thermally unstable and have low vapor pressure.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a CVD reactor with transverse reactant gas flow and symmetrical gas exhaustion to prevent wafer contamination, featuring multiple showerhead assemblies and isolator assemblies to isolate growth zones, and a heating system to maintain high reactor wall temperatures, ensuring effective desorption of arsenic deposits and reducing particulate accumulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional CVD reactor designs are used, then epitaxial growth can be achieved, but pyrolysis products condense on reactor walls and ceilings causing particulate contamination of wafers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer contaminationVSAvoidparticulate contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into multiple isolated processing regions separated by isolator assemblies. Each region has its own showerhead assembly for reactant gas supply and exhaust assembly for gas removal. This segmentation prevents contamination from propagating across the entire reactor and allows independent control of each processing zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The harmful condensation problem is extracted and addressed by positioning exhaust assemblies directly adjacent to showerhead assemblies in each processing region. This local extraction of process gases prevents the accumulation and subsequent condensation of pyrolysis products on reactor walls, eliminating the source of particulate contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Loss of substance

If conventional CVD reactor designs are used, then thin films can be deposited, but reactant usage efficiency is low due to condensation of AlGaAs, gallium, and arsenic species

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactant usage efficiencyVSAvoidreactor wall temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor maintains continuous epitaxial growth through multiple processing regions that operate in sequence. The wafer carrier traverses through each region, allowing continuous deposition without interruption. This continuous operation prevents the thermal instability and condensation of reactant species, maximizing reactant usage efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor employs controlled temperature gradients and gas flow parameters in each processing region. By optimizing these parameters, the system maintains reactant species in the vapor phase during deposition, preventing condensation on cooler reactor walls and improving reactant utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple showerhead assemblies and isolator assemblies are added to isolate growth zones, then wafer contamination is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer contaminationVSAvoidreactor structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each modular unit consisting of a showerhead assembly, isolator assembly, and exhaust assembly serves multiple functions: reactant gas supply, isolation between regions, and process gas exhaustion. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components and simplifies the overall reactor architecture despite the presence of multiple processing regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor is divided into modular processing regions that can be independently configured and controlled. Each module is a self-contained unit with standardized components, making the system easier to design, manufacture, and maintain despite the increased number of regions. The modular approach manages complexity through repetition of proven design units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If transverse reactant gas flow and symmetrical gas exhaustion are implemented, then particulate deposition on wafers is prevented, but gas flow control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticulate depositionVSAvoidgas flow control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor employs symmetrical gas exhaustion positioned opposite to the reactant gas flow direction. This asymmetric arrangement of gas flow paths creates effective gas exchange that prevents particulate deposition while maintaining relatively simple flow control. The symmetry in exhaust positioning balances the asymmetric reactant gas introduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces wafer contamination, maintains reactor cleanliness, and enhances the efficiency of reactant usage by preventing particulate deposition on the wafer, while allowing for continuous epitaxial growth with improved thermal management and in-situ cleaning processes.

Implementation Method 1

heating at least on wafer disposed on a wafer carrier by exposing a lower surface of a wafer carrier track to a radiation emitted from a lamp assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiation heating: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 2

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is the deposition of a thin film on a substrate by the reaction of vapor phase chemicals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical vapor deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 3

a first isolator assembly for supplying isolation gases to the processing region, a second showerhead assembly for supplying reactant gases to the processing region, a second isolator assembly for supplying isolation gases to the processing region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas phase isolation:

Implementation Method 4

at least one sidewall having an exhaust assembly for exhausting gases from the processing region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient flow: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9127364B2Reactor clean
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 UTICA LEASECO LLC
  • US9127364B2 patent drawing
  • US9127364B2 patent drawing
  • US9127364B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for performing chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes is provided. In one embodiment, the apparatus comprises a reactor body having a processing region, comprising a wafer carrier track having a wafer carrier disposed thereon, at least one sidewall having an exhaust assembly for exhausting gases from the processing region, a lid assembly disposed on the reactor body, comprising a lid support comprising a first showerhead assembly for supplying reactant gases to the processing region, a first isolator assembly for supplying isolation gases to the processing region, a second showerhead assembly for supplying reactant gases to the processing region, and a second isolator assembly for supplying isolation gases to the processing region, wherein the first showerhead assembly, the first isolator assembly, the second showerhead assembly, and the second isolator assembly are consecutively and linearly disposed next to each other.