CVD Reactor Wall Preheating and Rotatable Workpiece Holder

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing CVD reactors face challenges with preheating chamber limitations, premature gas consumption, deposition issues with Lewis acids and bases, complex sealing problems, and difficulty in regulating temperature, especially when handling reactive and corrosive gases with low vapor pressures.

Innovation Solution

The CVD reactor design introduces reaction gas into the chamber parallel to the heated reactor wall for efficient preheating, uses a rotatable tiered workpiece receiving element to maintain homogeneity, and features a smooth inner surface for easy cleaning, with separate inlet lines for gas mixing near the reactor chamber to avoid premature reactions, and a stationary outlet line to minimize sealing issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If a preheating chamber with flow diversions and baffles is used, then the reaction gas can be preheated, but the surface area for preheating is limited and gas flow is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction gas temperatureVSAvoidgas flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The preheating chamber is extracted from the inlet pipe and relocated to the reactor wall region. This allows the preheating function to be separated from the gas flow path constraints, enabling larger surface area for preheating without compromising gas flow rate through the inlet system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The preheating surface is extended from a linear inlet pipe configuration to a two-dimensional reactor wall surface. This dimensional change provides significantly more preheating area while maintaining gas flow velocity and rate through the inlet system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the amount of reaction gas is increased to shorten coating process, then productivity improves, but the heating capacity of preheating chamber must be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating speedVSAvoidheating capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor wall serves multiple functions: it acts as the reaction chamber boundary, provides the preheating surface for the reaction gas, and maintains the reaction temperature. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for a separate preheating chamber with dedicated heating elements, allowing increased gas flow rates without proportionally increasing heating power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Temperature

If flow diversions and baffles are added to preheating chamber, then preheating efficiency improves, but deposition on chamber surfaces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreheating efficiencyVSAvoiddeposition on chamber surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flow diversions and baffles are extracted from the preheating system. The preheating function is achieved through the reactor wall surface without requiring internal flow diversions, thereby eliminating the source of premature deposition while maintaining preheating efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using flow diversions and baffles to enhance preheating (which causes deposition), the design inverts the approach by using the reactor wall surface itself as the preheating element, allowing smooth gas flow without premature deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of operation

If a rotatable central inlet pipe is used, then gas distribution improves, but sealing problems occur at high temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas distribution uniformityVSAvoidsealing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rotation function is extracted from the inlet pipe and transferred to the workpiece receiving element. This allows the inlet pipe to remain stationary with reliable sealing, while still achieving uniform gas distribution through the rotation of the workpiece holder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of rotating the inlet pipe to achieve uniform gas distribution, the design inverts the approach by keeping the inlet pipe stationary and rotating the workpiece receiving element, thereby maintaining sealing reliability while achieving the same gas distribution uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

5Power

If preheating chamber surfaces are enlarged, then preheating capacity increases, but cleaning difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreheating capacityVSAvoidcleaning ease
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor wall serves as both the preheating surface and the reaction chamber boundary. This multi-functionality provides large preheating capacity through the extensive wall surface area while maintaining easy access for cleaning, as the entire surface is externally exposed and can be cleaned without disassembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for increased gas flow, quicker and more uniform coating with consistent layer properties, reduced deposition on reactor walls, and improved temperature control, enabling efficient processing of reactive gases without complex sealing challenges.

Implementation Method 1

reaction gas into the chamber parallel to the heated reactor wall for efficient preheating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 2

heated reactor wall for efficient preheating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

vapor-phase deposition of coatings, in particular hard material coatings, onto workpieces and the surfaces thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical vapor deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 4

chemical reactions of the chemical compounds contained in the reaction gas take place, and the desired main products of the chemical reactions are deposited on the surface of the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reactions: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 5

a tiered workpiece receiving element that is arranged preferably centrally in the reactor chamber is rotatable around its central axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational motion:

Data Source

PatentUS9297070B2Chemical vapor deposition reactor for depositing layers made of a reaction gas mixture onto workpieces
Publication Date: 2016.03.29 IHI BERNEX AG
  • US9297070B2 patent drawing
  • US9297070B2 patent drawing
  • US9297070B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a CVD-reactor for depositing layers made of a reaction gas onto workpieces. Said reactor comprises an elongate, vertical reaction chamber that is defined by a reactor wall and a reactor base, an inlet line for guiding the reaction gas into the reaction chamber, entering into the region of the reactor base in the reaction chamber, a central outlet line that guides the used reaction gas out of the reaction chamber and that extends out of the reactor chamber in the region of the reactor base, a tier-like workpiece receiving element that is arranged in a central manner in the reaction chamber and can be rotated about the central axis thereof.