Optimization Apparatus for Dynamic Cyber Attack Dealing Point Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for defending against cyber attacks fail to dynamically select the optimum dealing point and function, especially when network configurations change or resources are depleted, leading to ineffective defense mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

An optimization apparatus that collects cyber attack and system information to identify attack routes and extract dealing point candidates with effective functions, using optimization logic to select the optimal dealing point for executing defense functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If defense measures are concentrated at a particular dealing point, then defense effectiveness against cyber attacks is improved, but resources of the targeted device may be depleted and the dealing function may not operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefense effectivenessVSAvoidresource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection of dealing points based on real-time system information including load states and resource availability. The optimization apparatus continuously monitors system conditions and dynamically adjusts which dealing point executes the dealing function, preventing resource depletion at any single device while maintaining effective defense.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent assigns different roles and functions to different dealing points based on their local capabilities and current state. Rather than concentrating all defense functions at one point, the system distributes dealing functions across multiple suitable devices, with each dealing point optimized for its specific role and capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If a dedicated firewall near the attacker is selected by tracing IP address, then the dealing point nearer to the attacker is able to be selected, but only dedicated devices are targeted and the optimum dealing point cannot be dynamically selected for network configurations formed of different types of security devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoiddevice type adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal optimization apparatus that can evaluate and select from multiple types of security devices (firewalls, WAFs, IPS, virtual devices, etc.) based on their dealing functions rather than their specific device types. The system identifies dealing point candidates from any security device type and selects the optimum based on real-time conditions, making the system adaptable to heterogeneous network configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic selection of dealing points based on real-time system information including load states and resource availability. The optimization apparatus continuously monitors system conditions and dynamically adjusts which dealing point executes the dealing function, preventing resource depletion at any single device while maintaining effective defense.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If static rules are used to determine dealing points, then the dealing point determination process is simple, but the system cannot adapt to dynamic changes in network configuration and load states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoiddynamic adaptation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the optimization apparatus continuously collects system information about load states, resource availability, and network conditions. This feedback is used to dynamically adjust the selection of dealing points, ensuring the system adapts to changing conditions while maintaining a relatively simple overall architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization apparatus automatically monitors system conditions and makes decisions about dealing point selection without requiring manual intervention. The system self-adjusts to changing network configurations and load states by autonomously evaluating system information and selecting the most appropriate dealing point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10616270B2Optimization apparatus, optimization method, and optimization program
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP
  • US10616270B2 patent drawing
  • US10616270B2 patent drawing
  • US10616270B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optimization apparatus collects cyber attack information that is information related to a cyber attack, and system information that is information related to an entire system including a device that has received the cyber attack. Based on the collected cyber attack information and system information, the optimization apparatus identifies an attack route of the cyber attack, and extracts, as dealing point candidates, devices that are on the attack route and have an effective dealing function against the cyber attack. Subsequently, the optimization apparatus selects a dealing point from the extracted dealing point candidates by using optimization logic that has been set.