Cyber Control Monitoring With Objective Health Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for monitoring system controls are inefficient and time-consuming, making it difficult to quickly identify and mitigate cyber threats in real-time, as they lack a standardized and objective way to evaluate the health of system controls and allocate resources effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system that receives data from multiple sources, analyzes control health variables in real-time, maps their values to a cyber health scale, and uses machine learning to identify potential issues and initiate mitigation actions based on objective scores compared to predetermined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If real-time monitoring and evaluation of system controls is implemented, then the speed of identifying and mitigating cyber threats is improved, but the complexity of the monitoring system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of identifying and mitigating cyber threatsVSAvoidcomplexity of the monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is divided into distinct functional modules: data collection module, control health variable evaluation module, objective score determination module, and mitigation action module. Each module handles specific tasks independently, enabling real-time processing while maintaining system manageability and reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw control health variable data into standardized objective scores through defined threshold ranges and mapping functions. This parameter transformation approach enables rapid real-time evaluation without requiring complex analysis algorithms, thus improving speed while keeping the system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive data analysis is performed to evaluate control health variables, then the precision of threat identification is improved, but the time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of threat identificationVSAvoidtime required for analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes threshold ranges and mapping criteria for control health variables before actual monitoring begins. This preliminary configuration allows the system to perform rapid real-time comparisons and score determinations without requiring complex runtime calculations, thus achieving both high precision and fast analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical or manual analysis processes with automated computational evaluation. By using algorithmic threshold comparisons and objective score mapping, the system achieves precise threat identification in real-time without the time-consuming manual analysis that would otherwise be required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If multiple control health variables are monitored simultaneously, then the completeness of system evaluation is improved, but the difficulty of comparing and prioritizing issues increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of system evaluationVSAvoiddifficulty of comparing and prioritizing issues
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies a universal objective score framework that can evaluate multiple different control health variables using the same standardized threshold ranges and mapping functions. This universal approach enables comprehensive monitoring of diverse system controls while maintaining ease of comparison and prioritization through consistent scoring, thus improving reliability without increasing difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11275367B2Dynamically monitoring system controls to identify and mitigate issues
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US11275367B2 patent drawing
  • US11275367B2 patent drawing
  • US11275367B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Arrangements for dynamic system control evaluation and issue identification and mitigation are provided. In some examples, data may be received from a plurality of sources. The data may be received in batches at predetermined intervals or time periods, and/or as streaming data. In some examples, a first system control may be identified and a first system control value may be determined for the first system control. A plurality of threshold ranges associated with the first system control may be identified and the first system control value may be compared to the plurality of threshold ranges. Based on the comparing, the first system control value may be mapped to an objective score on a cyber health scale. The objective score may then be evaluated to determine whether an issue is occurring or is likely to occur. If so, one or more mitigation actions may be identified and implemented.