Cyber-Physical Control Process Generation Using Potential Fields

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for automated control process generation in cyber-physical systems lack a general approach to describe target constellations and transitions from arbitrary start constellations, hindering the automatic generation of control processes.

Innovation Solution

A method specifying control processes for cyber-physical systems involves modeling cyber-physical objects with parametrized functions, assigning parameters representing degrees of freedom, and using artificial potential fields to evaluate progress and generate control instructions through experimentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If global path planning algorithms are used to evaluate all possible configurations, then a collision-free path can be found, but the method requires prior knowledge of the complete operative environment and high computational resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision-free path guaranteeVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the configuration space into discrete configurations and uses systematic exploration methods (RRT, PRM) to divide the path planning problem into manageable phases: preprocessing to generate collision-free configurations and query phase to find paths between them

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-computing and storing collision-free configurations in a roadmap structure before actual path planning is needed, allowing faster query-time path finding without re-evaluating all configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If local path planning algorithms are used to find trajectories from actual configuration, then situational knowledge is utilized, but complete path planning from start to target configuration is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituational adaptabilityVSAvoidcomplete path planning
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the path planner continuously evaluates the current configuration against the roadmap of pre-computed collision-free configurations, using shortest path algorithms (Dijkstra) to dynamically determine optimal paths based on current situational knowledge while guaranteeing complete path planning from start to target

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If evolutionary artificial potential field method is used for configuration planning, then attractive and repulsive forces guide movement, but the method may get trapped in local minima

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic trajectory generationVSAvoidconvergence to global optimum
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic path planning algorithms (RRT, PRM) that adaptively explore the configuration space rather than following static potential field gradients, allowing the system to dynamically adjust exploration strategies and escape local minima by randomly sampling new configurations or revisiting previously explored areas with different parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If automated control process generation is implemented, then control efficiency is improved, but lack of general approach to describe target constellation and transitions prevents viability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol process generation efficiencyVSAvoidgeneral applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal control process generation framework that can handle diverse cyber-physical systems by defining abstract concepts (control process targets, observation targets, constellations) that apply generally across different domains, allowing the same experimental approach to generate control processes for various systems with different parameters and objectives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter-based representations where control processes are defined by configurable parameters (target constellations, observation selections, experimental settings) that can be adjusted to suit different applications, enabling automated generation across diverse systems through parameter variation rather than system-specific customization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240176347A1Automated control process generation
Publication Date: 2024.05.30 ASCON SYST HLDG GMBH
  • US20240176347A1 patent drawing
  • US20240176347A1 patent drawing
  • US20240176347A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to the field of automated control process generation for control of a cyber-physical system. In more detail the present invention relates to a method of specifying a control process for a cyber-physical system and a related control process specifying engine. Control process specification is achieved by specifying at least one control process observation target to be reached by the control process. Then, according to the present invention a method of generating at least one control process instruction for the specified control process and a related control process experiment execution engine are used for automated control process generation through execution of control process experiments.