Cyber Range Generation With Conversational Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The creation of cyber ranges is a time-consuming, expensive, and tedious process that often results in non-functional or incorrectly constructed ranges, requiring detailed user input and expertise, and is difficult to modify or update.

Innovation Solution

A cyber range development system that uses a generative model to transform user inputs into a graphical representation, validate the range, and generate specifications for deployment, leveraging a large language model for conversational interaction and automated vulnerability assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional manual methods are used to create cyber ranges, then customization for specific training scenarios is possible, but the process is time-consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidcreation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates templates from previously generated cyber ranges that can be reused and modified for new training scenarios. Instead of manually creating each range from scratch, the system copies and adapts existing range configurations, significantly reducing creation time while maintaining customization capability through template-based modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs automated generation algorithms that self-configure cyber ranges based on high-level scenario descriptions. The system serves itself by automatically translating training scenario requirements into complete range configurations without requiring manual intervention for each component, thus reducing both time and expertise requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If detailed specifications are required for cyber range creation, then functional accuracy can be improved, but user expertise requirements increase and the process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of automated configuration tools that translate high-level training scenario descriptions into detailed technical specifications. This intermediary automatically handles the complex mapping between user intent and implementation details, maintaining functional accuracy while shielding users from complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual configuration processes with automated generation algorithms and AI-driven configuration tools. These automated systems handle the complex specification generation, validation, and optimization tasks that previously required expert manual intervention, thereby maintaining precision while reducing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If manual construction methods are used, then initial creation is possible, but modifications and updates become difficult and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial creation easeVSAvoidmodification ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic configuration management where cyber ranges are defined through parameterized templates and configuration files rather than static manual constructions. This allows rapid modification by simply updating configuration parameters or swapping template components, making the system adaptable to changing training requirements without complex reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If expert knowledge is required for cyber range creation, then quality can be maintained, but accessibility to non-experts is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assuranceVSAvoiduser accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces automated validation and quality assurance intermediaries that check generated configurations against best practices and functional requirements. These intermediary systems enforce quality standards automatically, allowing non-experts to create reliable cyber ranges without requiring deep domain knowledge, while still maintaining quality through automated verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260075076A1Method and system for cyber range development
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 CIRCADENCE CORP
  • US20260075076A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075076A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075076A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cyber range development system and method is configured to receive conversational inputs from a user regarding a desired cyber range, generate a graphical representation of the desired cyber range from the inputs, validate the created range, and export specifications for the created range for use by a range orchestrator in generating the actual range.