Cyber Range Integrating Technical and Non-Technical Participants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cyber range systems fail to integrate non-technical and technical participants effectively, do not account for missing participants, and do not utilize a full range of AI bots to simulate real-world cyberattacks, leading to incomplete training and response preparation.

Innovation Solution

A holistic cyber range system that integrates technical and non-technical participants using cross-contextual AI bots to simulate real-world scenarios, train AI bots, and replace missing participants, providing comprehensive cyber warfare training across an organization's personnel spectrum.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional cyber range systems focus only on technical participants, then technical training effectiveness is improved, but holistic organizational response capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetechnical training effectivenessVSAvoidholistic organizational response capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cyber range system is designed to serve multiple participant types (technical and non-technical) simultaneously through a unified platform. The system accommodates diverse roles including cybersecurity professionals, business leaders, legal counsel, and public relations personnel, enabling holistic organizational response training while maintaining specialized technical training capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments participants into different categories (technical vs. non-technical) and provides role-specific interfaces and training modules while integrating them into a unified simulation environment. This allows tailored training experiences for each group while maintaining overall system coherence and organizational-wide response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If AI bots are extensively used to replace human participants, then simulation scalability and continuity are improved, but human interaction realism deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation scalabilityVSAvoidhuman interaction realism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates digital copies of human participants in the form of AI bots that replicate human behavior patterns, decision-making processes, and interaction styles. These bots can be trained on actual human performance data to maintain realism while enabling unlimited simulation repetitions and scalability without requiring additional human participants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

AI bots serve as intermediaries between the simulation environment and human trainers, bridging the gap between automated scalability and human interaction realism. The bots can be configured to varying degrees of autonomy and realism, allowing flexible adjustment based on training objectives while maintaining continuous simulation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the cyber range integrates all participant types and AI bots, then comprehensive training coverage is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive training coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A unified cyber range platform is designed to handle multiple participant types, roles, and interaction modes through a single integrated system. The architecture supports technical participants, non-technical participants, AI bots, and various simulation scenarios simultaneously, reducing the need for separate systems while maintaining comprehensive training coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automated participant management, AI bot training, and simulation orchestration capabilities that reduce manual configuration and management overhead. The platform can automatically provision new participant types, train AI bots on available data, and coordinate complex multi-party simulations without proportionally increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11138312B2Cyber range integrating technical and non-technical participants, participant substitution with AI bots, and AI bot training
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US11138312B2 patent drawing
  • US11138312B2 patent drawing
  • US11138312B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cyber range system provides a cyber warfare training platform that integrates participation of technical (such as cyber defense personnel) and non-technical participants (such as executives or managers of an organization) within a simulation run, simulates missing participants with cross-contextual AI bots, and trains the bots in a simulated target network may be provided. The system may discover and simulate an organization's computer network so that personnel may be trained on a simulation that mimics their own network. The system may generate role bots that may each simulate a role of a participant. Each of these role bots may be computationally trained over the course of multiple simulation runs based on assessments of a training team that may moderate the simulation runs. Updated versions of the role bots may be stored in a data store for execution in the simulation run or future simulation runs.