Cyberattack Prevention via Computational Puzzles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex cybersecurity systems are computationally intensive and slow, making them ineffective in timely analysis of network communications, leading to potential overload and increased vulnerability to cyberattacks like distributed denial of service attacks.

Innovation Solution

A system that requires client devices to solve randomly generated mathematical problems before responding to communications, ensuring only capable devices are acknowledged, thereby filtering out potential cyberattack devices by stripping them of functionality and reducing the computational load on the cybersecurity system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rigorous analysis of every internet communication is conducted, then cyberattack detection accuracy is improved, but system response time deteriorates and computational load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecyberattack detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the communication analysis process into two distinct stages: a fast first-stage filter that performs basic packet inspection and header analysis to quickly eliminate obvious attacks, and a second-stage deep analysis that applies rigorous examination only to communications that pass the first stage. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high detection accuracy while significantly reducing the time and computational resources spent on the majority of benign traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by applying full rigorous analysis only to a small subset of communications that are suspected of being malicious, while applying lighter-weight analysis to the majority of traffic. The first-stage filter performs sufficient analysis to identify obvious threats without the overhead of complete deep packet inspection, thereby achieving adequate detection accuracy for common attacks while preserving system response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If computationally intensive cybersecurity analysis is performed on all communications, then cyberattack detection capability is improved, but system productivity deteriorates due to overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecyberattack detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the communication processing workload into two segments: a high-throughput first-stage filter that handles all incoming communications with minimal computational overhead, and a low-volume second-stage analysis that performs intensive examination only on suspicious traffic. This segmentation prevents the computationally intensive analysis from becoming a bottleneck, thereby maintaining both detection capability and system productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary filtering in the first stage by analyzing communication headers, source/destination addresses, and basic patterns to identify and eliminate obviously malicious traffic before it reaches the intensive analysis stage. This preliminary action reduces the volume of traffic requiring full computational analysis, thereby preventing system overload while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If complex cybersecurity systems are deployed to defend against evolving cyberattacks, then security coverage is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the security system into modular stages with distinct functions: the first stage handles basic filtering and pattern matching, while the second stage performs advanced analysis on suspicious traffic. This modular segmentation allows the system to provide comprehensive security coverage through multiple layers of defense while keeping each individual component relatively simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first-stage filter acts as an intermediary between the incoming communications and the intensive second-stage analysis. It performs preliminary processing and triage, directing only suspicious traffic to the complex analysis stage while allowing benign traffic to pass through with minimal processing. This intermediary function reduces the overall system complexity by preventing the complex analysis mechanisms from being activated for every communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If real-time analysis of large quantities of data from many client devices is performed, then security monitoring coverage is improved, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring coverageVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data analysis process into two stages: a resource-efficient first stage that processes all incoming data with minimal computational overhead to identify suspicious patterns, and a resource-intensive second stage that performs detailed analysis only on data flagged by the first stage. This segmentation enables comprehensive security monitoring coverage across all client devices while significantly reducing overall computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing full computational analysis only on a small fraction of communications that exhibit suspicious characteristics, while applying lightweight monitoring to the majority of traffic. The first-stage filter uses minimal resources to identify anomalies, and the second stage consumes intensive resources only when necessary, thereby achieving comprehensive monitoring coverage with controlled resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11509685B2Cyberattack prevention system
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 PAYPAL INC
  • US11509685B2 patent drawing
  • US11509685B2 patent drawing
  • US11509685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-updating system for defending against a cyberattack requests connected devices to solve a problem that is created in a random manner. The problems are created in a manner such that the system can determine whether the client device is being used as part of a cyberattack based on how the client device responds to the problems.