Cybersecurity Engine for Generative AI Attack Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional security management systems lack the capability to effectively simulate cybersecurity attacks using generative AI models, such as Large Language Models (LLMs), leading to inadequate defense mechanisms against human-like attacks and a failure to recognize and mitigate emerging threats in real-time.

Innovation Solution

A cybersecurity engine is developed to leverage generative AI models for automated execution of human-like cyberattacks, simulating realistic scenarios to strengthen defenses, using a controlled computing environment and advanced simulation frameworks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional cybersecurity simulation methods are used, then the system can evaluate cyber threats, but it cannot effectively simulate generative AI-related cyberattacks or understand adaptive human-like attack behaviors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to simulate generative AI cyberattacksVSAvoiddetection accuracy of AI-generated attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simulated computing environment that copies real-world attack scenarios using generative AI models. The system generates synthetic attack data and simulated cyber threats that mirror actual generative AI-based attacks, allowing defenders to train and test detection mechanisms without needing real malicious samples. This copying approach enables realistic simulation while maintaining safety and controllability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-generating diverse attack scenarios and training datasets using generative AI models before actual security incidents occur. The simulated environment pre-establishes various attack vectors, techniques, and procedures that malicious actors might use, allowing security systems to be proactively trained and tested rather than reactively responding to real threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If a controlled computing environment with generative AI models is implemented, then realistic attack simulation is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation realismVSAvoidcomputing environment structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulated computing environment is segmented into distinct functional components: generative AI models for attack generation, simulation engines for scenario execution, analysis modules for threat assessment, and interface layers for user interaction. This segmentation allows each component to be independently developed, tested, and optimized, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining simulation realism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements universal components that perform multiple functions. The generative AI models serve both as attack simulators and as sources of training data. The simulation environment simultaneously supports multiple attack types, defense strategies, and evaluation metrics. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate systems needed, simplifying the overall architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If conventional detection mechanisms are used, then basic cyber threats can be identified, but generative AI-generated attacks cannot be effectively recognized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection of AI-generated content
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where detection results from simulated attacks are continuously fed back into the generative AI models and detection algorithms. The simulated environment provides immediate feedback on detection accuracy, false positive rates, and analysis quality. This feedback enables iterative optimization of detection mechanisms specifically tuned to identify generative AI-generated attacks while reducing false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system uses composite approaches combining multiple analysis techniques: traditional signature-based detection, behavioral analysis, generative AI model output analysis, and contextual understanding. This composite detection strategy leverages the strengths of different methods to effectively identify AI-generated attacks that would evade single-approach systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Productivity

If automated attack execution using generative AI is implemented, then comprehensive vulnerability identification is achieved, but computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability identification speedVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively executing only the most relevant attack scenarios based on the specific computing environment being tested. Rather than running all possible generative AI attack vectors uniformly, the system prioritizes attacks most likely to reveal vulnerabilities in the target system. This selective approach maintains high productivity while reducing unnecessary computational energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes computational parameters such as model complexity, simulation duration, and attack intensity based on the phase of testing and the specific vulnerabilities being investigated. During initial scanning, simpler models and faster simulations are used. When deep analysis of specific vulnerabilities is needed, more computationally intensive generative AI models are deployed. This adaptive parameter adjustment optimizes the balance between productivity and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12537846B2Cybersecurity engine in a security management system
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12537846B2 patent drawing
  • US12537846B2 patent drawing
  • US12537846B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer storage media for providing cybersecurity simulation management using a cybersecurity engine in a security management system. Cybersecurity simulation management supports providing a controlled computing environment associated with generative artificial intelligence (AI) security operations for responding to cyber-threats and incidents. In operation, a prompt for a task is communicated from a host machine to a generative AI model. The prompt is associated with a generative AI cybersecurity simulation environment comprising the host machine, the generative AI model, an attacker machine, and a victim machine. The host machine receives a first response from the generative AI model. Based on the first response, the host machine communicates a command to the attacker machine, where the attack machine generates a second response based on executing the command on the victim machine. The host machine receives the second response. The second response is tagged as an outcome associated with the task.