Cybersecurity Language Model Training for Non-Linguistic Token Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Language models trained with self-supervised learning on cybersecurity documents are negatively affected by the high presence of non-linguistic elements, which are complex and arbitrary, leading to inefficiencies in learning and performance.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that classify non-linguistic elements in cybersecurity documents into completely non-linguistic and paralinguistic elements, allowing the language model to focus on linguistic elements by replacing or masking only completely non-linguistic elements, and training to predict and classify these elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If self-supervised learning is applied to cybersecurity documents containing non-linguistic elements, then the language model can process cybersecurity data, but the performance deteriorates due to complex and arbitrary non-linguistic elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to process cybersecurity dataVSAvoidlanguage model performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments cybersecurity documents into linguistic elements and non-linguistic elements, applying different processing strategies to each. Linguistic elements are used for self-supervised learning while non-linguistic elements are excluded or separately handled, resolving the contradiction between processing cybersecurity data and maintaining model performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quality standards to different parts of the document: linguistic elements receive full processing attention for learning, while non-linguistic elements are filtered out or given minimal processing, allowing the model to focus on meaningful patterns without being degraded by arbitrary strings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If non-linguistic elements are included in training data, then more cybersecurity information is captured, but learning efficiency decreases due to meaningless strings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecybersecurity information captureVSAvoidlearning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes non-linguistic elements from the training data before applying self-supervised learning. This extraction process eliminates meaningless strings that reduce learning efficiency while preserving linguistic elements that contain actionable cybersecurity information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the presence of non-linguistic elements from a harmful factor into a benefit by using them as a basis for classification tasks. The model learns to identify and categorize different types of non-linguistic elements (IP addresses, hashes, URLs), turning previously harmful noise into structured information that enhances overall system capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Measurement precision

If the language model processes all elements in cybersecurity documents, then comprehensive analysis is achieved, but training complexity increases due to arbitrary strings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive document analysisVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification of document elements before the main language modeling training. Non-linguistic elements are identified and categorized in advance, allowing the training process to focus only on linguistic elements, thereby reducing training complexity while maintaining comprehensive analysis capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260010715A1Method of training language model for cybersecurity and system performing the same
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 S2W INC
  • US20260010715A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010715A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010715A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a system for training a language model for cybersecurity, which includes: a document collection unit that collects a cybersecurity document used for training a language model for cybersecurity; an extraction unit that identifies non-linguistic elements in the cybersecurity document based on a non-linguistic element database; a tokenization unit that tokenizes the cybersecurity document to generate a plurality of tokens; and a language model application unit that controls the language model to simultaneously perform a first task of classifying types of the non-linguistic elements including at least one of a Bitcoin address, a hash value, an IP address, and a vulnerability identifier included in the cybersecurity document and a second task of recovering only linguistic elements of the cybersecurity document.