Cybersecurity Pipeline Modeling for Dynamic Incident Valuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cybersecurity systems and architectures face challenges such as lack of integrated incident response capabilities, complex procurement processes for incident response services, and inability to dynamically adapt to changes in the security landscape.

Innovation Solution

A customized cybersecurity framework that includes a data protection system for pipeline modeling, which identifies and collects cybersecurity incident data, generates metadata to characterize cyber incidents, determines catastrophic incidents, and provides a claim data package to a protection entity computing system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a customized cybersecurity framework with pipeline modeling is implemented, then incident response capabilities are integrated and security landscape adaptability is improved, but device complexity and implementation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity landscape adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cybersecurity framework is divided into distinct pipeline stages (data collection, metadata generation, catastrophic incident determination, claim data packaging) that can be independently configured and managed. This segmentation allows the system to adapt to different security landscapes by adjusting individual stages without redesigning the entire system, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The framework employs dynamic metadata generation that adapts to changing incident characteristics and security conditions. The system can dynamically adjust its analysis parameters, metadata schemas, and incident classification criteria based on the evolving security landscape, enabling adaptability while maintaining manageable complexity through automated adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive cybersecurity incident data collection and metadata generation are performed, then measurement precision and incident characterization are improved, but loss of time and processing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident characterization precisionVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data validation and metadata schema preparation before actual incident analysis. By pre-configuring metadata templates and validation rules, the system reduces processing time during incident response while maintaining comprehensive characterization precision through the pre-established analytical framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The framework uses metadata templates and standardized data structures that can be replicated across different incident types. This copying approach allows comprehensive incident characterization to be achieved through template instantiation rather than creating unique analysis structures for each incident, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If catastrophic incident determination and claim data packaging are automated, then productivity and response speed are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident response productivityVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated determination and packaging system uses universal metadata schemas and standardized processing workflows that handle multiple incident types through a single unified platform. This multi-functionality approach improves productivity by eliminating the need for separate systems for different incident types while managing complexity through standardization rather than proliferation of specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250080562A1Systems and methods for dynamic valuation of protection products
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 AS0001 INC
  • US20250080562A1 patent drawing
  • US20250080562A1 patent drawing
  • US20250080562A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable storage media for pipeline modeling. A data protection system can include one or more processing circuits including memory and at least one processor configured to verify a state of cybersecurity of an entity based on one or more cybersecurity measures implemented by the entity at a time of a catastrophic incident and generate data comprising the state of the cybersecurity from cybersecurity incident data based on at least on at least one categorized incident and corresponding at least one claim. The at least one processor can determine at least one categorized incident corresponding with at least one claim corresponds to the catastrophic incident based on at least on the data, generate a claim data package comprising the data and the catastrophic incident, and provide the claim data package to a computing system.