Cyclic CTLA-4 Peptides for Specific Checkpoint Blockade

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing small molecule drugs and antibody drugs face challenges such as toxicity, low specificity, difficulty in targeting intracellular molecules, and high manufacturing costs, while no middle molecule drugs effectively inhibit CTLA-4 function for immune checkpoint modulation.

Innovation Solution

Development of cyclic peptides through ribosome display technology, optimized for S—S bond formation, which specifically bind to CTLA-4 and inhibit its interaction with CD80, utilizing various molecular chaperones and affinity maturation to identify high-affinity binders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If small molecule drugs are used, then manufacturing cost is low and administration is easy, but toxicity and side effects increase due to low specificity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidtoxicity and side effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the molecular size parameter from small molecule to middle molecule (peptide), and introduces cyclic structure to enhance specificity. This resolves the contradiction by achieving both reasonable manufacturability and reduced toxicity through improved target specificity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a cyclic peptide structure that combines the advantages of peptides (specificity, stability) while maintaining middle-molecule characteristics. This composite approach achieves balanced performance between manufacturability and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If antibody drugs are used, then specificity and efficacy are high, but manufacturing cost is high and oral administration is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecificity and efficacyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and administration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large antibody molecule into a smaller cyclic peptide structure that maintains binding specificity. This segmentation achieves the reliability of antibodies while improving manufacturability and administration characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the molecular size parameter from large (antibody) to middle (cyclic peptide), making oral administration feasible while maintaining sufficient specificity through the cyclic structure and targeted binding sites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If linear peptides are used, then ease of synthesis is high, but stability and membrane permeability are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of synthesisVSAvoidstability and membrane permeability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the linear peptide into a cyclic structure, introducing curvature to the molecular architecture. This cyclic configuration enhances stability and membrane permeability while maintaining synthesis feasibility through established peptide cyclization methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Device complexity

If conventional selection methods are used, then workflow is simple, but obtaining high-affinity binders is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow complexityVSAvoidaffinity of binders
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates affinity maturation as a preliminary action in the selection workflow, systematically improving binder affinity through iterative mutagenesis and selection. This preliminary optimization ensures high-affinity binders are obtained while maintaining a manageable workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms in the selection process, using binding data to guide subsequent selection rounds and affinity maturation steps. This feedback loop efficiently identifies high-affinity binders by continuously optimizing based on measured performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The cyclic peptides effectively inhibit CTLA-4 function, offering a potential immune checkpoint inhibitor for therapeutic applications, particularly in treating cancers by modulating the immune system.

Implementation Method 1

the cyclic peptide binds specifically to CTLA-4 and inhibits the interaction between CTLA-4 and CD80

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMolecular recognition:

Implementation Method 2

the concentration of oxidants and reductants optimal for S—S bond formation can be freely set

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS12565517B2Cyclic peptide having CTLA-4 inhibitory activity and use thereof
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 GENEFRONTIER CORP
  • US12565517B2 patent drawing
  • US12565517B2 patent drawing
  • US12565517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a cyclic peptide which comprises the amino acid sequence represented by formula (I)X1-His-Pro-X4-Leu-X6-X7-X8-Ser-X10-His-Phe  (I)in the cycle and has an activity to specifically bind to human CTLA-4, wherein X1, X4, X6, X7, X8 and X10 are each independently any amino acid.