Cyclic Olefin Polymer Blends for Automotive Structural Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cyclic olefin polymers have high glass transition temperatures and stiffness but are too brittle for many applications, and polyolefins lack the necessary mechanical and heat resistance properties, making them unsuitable for automotive structural applications.

Innovation Solution

Blending high glass transition temperature cyclic olefin polymers with compatible low glass transition temperature polyolefin elastomers and fillers, such as talc or glass fibers, to achieve a balance of high stiffness, impact toughness, and thermal stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If cyclic olefin polymers are used to achieve high glass transition temperature and stiffness, then heat resistance and rigidity are improved, but impact resistance deteriorates and the material becomes too brittle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglass transition temperatureVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by blending cyclic olefin polymer with polyolefin elastomer and inorganic filler to create a multi-phase composite system. The cyclic olefin polymer matrix provides high glass transition temperature and stiffness, while the dispersed polyolefin elastomer domains provide impact toughness through ductile deformation mechanisms, and the inorganic filler reinforces the structure. This composite approach allows simultaneous achievement of heat resistance (Tg > 100°C) and impact resistance (notched Izod > 100 J/m) that cannot be obtained with single polymers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If polyolefins are used to achieve low cost and good processability, then manufacturing ease is improved, but mechanical strength and heat resistance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprocessabilityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials to overcome polyolefin limitations. The polyolefin elastomer component maintains good processability and compatibility with cyclic olefin polymer, while the inorganic filler (talc, mica, or glass fibers) provides reinforcement to achieve flexural modulus > 1400 MPa and heat distortion temperature > 140°C, transforming a weak polymer into a high-performance composite suitable for automotive structural applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If polypropylene is blended with EPR or EPDM rubber to improve impact resistance, then impact toughness is improved, but heat distortion temperature and flexural modulus deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidheat distortion temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by selecting a cyclic olefin polymer with fundamentally higher glass transition temperature (>100°C) as the matrix material, replacing polypropylene. This changes the baseline thermal parameter of the system. The polyolefin elastomer modifier is then selected specifically for its compatibility with cyclic olefin polymer and its ability to provide impact toughness without excessively lowering the heat distortion temperature, achieving a different optimization balance than traditional polypropylene/EPR blends.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Temperature

If inorganic fillers are added to achieve high heat distortion temperature and stiffness, then heat resistance and rigidity are improved, but impact resistance may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat distortion temperatureVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials with a three-phase structure: cyclic olefin polymer matrix, polyolefin elastomer domains, and inorganic filler particles. The key is the synergistic interaction where the polyolefin elastomer acts as a toughening agent that compensates for the brittleness introduced by inorganic filler. The filler provides reinforcement and heat resistance (HDT > 140°C), while the elastomer domains provide ductile deformation mechanisms that maintain impact resistance (notched Izod > 100 J/m) despite the presence of rigid filler particles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS8344070B2Polymer compositions comprising cyclic olefin polymers, polyolefin modifiers, and fillers
Publication Date: 2013.01.01 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC
  • US8344070B2 patent drawing
  • US8344070B2 patent drawing
  • US8344070B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A polymer composition comprises (a) least 40 wt % (based upon the weight of the composition) of a cyclic olefin polymer comprising at least one acyclic olefin and at least 20 wt % of one or more cyclic olefins (based upon the weight of the cyclic olefin polymer), wherein at least a portion of the cyclic olefin polymer has a glass transition temperature of greater than 100° C.; (b) an acyclic olefin polymer modifier in an amount up to 40 wt % (based upon the weight of the composition); and (c) at least 10 wt % (based upon the weight of the composition) of one of more fillers. The polymer composition has a notched Izod impact resistance measured at 23° C. of greater than 100 J/m and a flexural modulus (1% secant method) of greater than 1400 MPa.