Cyclone vacuum cleaner and cyclone separation device thereof

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cyclone separation devices in vacuum cleaners are inadequate for industrial dust filtering due to complex structures and maintenance issues, and fail to meet the dust collection needs of industrial scales.

Innovation Solution

A cyclone separation device with an airflow guiding member in the cyclone chamber, featuring a cyclone chamber with an air inlet, annular sidewall, dust collecting region, and air outlet, along with an airflow guiding member that includes an airflow guiding chamber, entry and discharge openings, and a support section, which enhances airflow spiraling and dust collection efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the volume of the chamber in the separation barrel is increased to enhance dust filtering effect, then the dust filtering effect is improved, but the overall volume of the cyclone separator expands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedust filtering effectVSAvoidoverall volume of cyclone separator
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The cyclone separator is divided into multiple functional chambers: a first cyclone chamber for primary dust separation and a second cyclone chamber for secondary dust separation. This segmentation allows the system to achieve enhanced dust filtering effect through multi-stage separation without requiring a single large-volume chamber, thus avoiding excessive overall volume expansion while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a multi-layer dust filtering inner barrel is provided in the separation barrel to reinforce dust filtering effect, then the dust filtering effect is improved, but the structure of the cyclone separator becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedust filtering effectVSAvoidstructure of cyclone separator
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a complex multi-layer inner barrel structure, the patent segments the separation function into two distinct cyclone chambers. Each chamber operates independently with its own airflow path and dust collection mechanism, achieving enhanced filtration through series connection rather than through complex layered structures, thereby maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an air outlet from the first cyclone chamber that serves as an intermediary, directing separated air flow into the second cyclone chamber. This intermediary airflow path allows the system to achieve multi-stage separation without requiring complex integrated structures, as each chamber functions as an independent module connected through simple airflow channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a multi-layer dust filtering inner barrel is provided to enhance dust filtering effect, then the dust filtering effect is improved, but maintenance becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedust filtering effectVSAvoidmaintenance of cyclone separator
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The cyclone separator is segmented into two independent chambers, each with separate dust collection regions and outlets. This segmentation allows maintenance personnel to access and clean each chamber independently without disassembling the entire structure, significantly improving ease of repair compared to integrated multi-layer inner barrel designs where all components are interconnected and difficult to access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If a multi-layer dust filtering inner barrel is provided to reinforce dust filtering effect, then the dust filtering effect is improved, but periodical replacement of the dust filtering inner barrel becomes a major issue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedust filtering effectVSAvoidreplacement of dust filtering inner barrel
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the separation function into two independent cyclone chambers with separate dust collection regions, the patent eliminates the need for a single complex multi-layer inner barrel that would require periodic replacement. Each chamber can be independently cleaned and maintained, and if replacement is needed, only the affected chamber needs to be serviced rather than replacing an entire integrated inner barrel structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The air outlet from the first cyclone chamber acts as an intermediary that separates the airflow paths of the two chambers. This intermediary structure allows each chamber to function as an independent module with its own dust collection and discharge system, eliminating the need for periodic replacement of a shared inner barrel structure and simplifying maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a simpler structure for easier installation and more effective dust filtering, ensuring better airflow guidance and increased dust collection efficiency suitable for industrial applications.

Implementation Method 1

Due to a centrifugal force, particulates in a vortex airflow are rotated at a high speed. As the rotational speed gets higher, the speed of centrifugal sedimentation of the particulates also becomes higher, such that the particulates can be separated from the airflow.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

Cyclone separation is a kind of centrifugal sedimentation. When in use, air containing particulates enters from the air inlet 81, and forms a descending vortex flow along the inner wall of the separation barrel 8.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclone separation: Cyclone Separation

Implementation Method 3

Due to the weight of the particulates, the particulates cannot ascend with the ascending airflow and are deposited at the bottom of the separation barrel 8, thereby producing a dust collecting effect.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2923625B1Cyclone vacuum cleaner and cyclone separation device thereof
Publication Date: 2016.06.22 XPOLE PRECISION TOOLS INC
  • EP2923625B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2923625B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2923625B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A cyclone separation device (1) includes a cyclone chamber (11) and an airflow guiding member (12). The cyclone chamber (11) includes an air inlet (111), an annular sidewall (112) forming an air receiving region (S1) therein communicating with the air inlet (111) and guiding an airflow to flow spirally in the air receiving region (S1), and a dust collecting region (S2) and an air outlet (113) disposed at two ends of the cyclone chamber (11) along an axis (L2) of the cyclone chamber (11). The dust collecting region (S2) communicates with the air receiving region (S1). The airflow guiding member (12) is disposed at the dust collecting region (S2), and includes an airflow guiding chamber (121), at least one airflow entry opening (122) communicating with the dust collecting region (S2) and airflow guiding chamber (121), and an airflow discharge opening (123) communicating with the airflow guiding chamber (121) and disposed on the axis (L2) of the cyclone chamber (11) to face the air outlet (113) and output the airflow to form an air discharging region (S3).