Cyclone Chamber Layout Without Vortex Finder Back Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vacuum cleaners with smaller suction motors produce less suction, reducing cleaning efficiency due to back pressure from traditional vortex finders, which also increase weight and reduce battery life in battery-operated models.

Innovation Solution

The design eliminates or reduces the size of the vortex finder, using a screen in the cyclone chamber to prevent hair and larger particles from exiting, allowing for improved airflow and cleaning performance without the weight and power constraints of traditional vortex finders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If a smaller suction motor is used to reduce weight, then the weight of the vacuum cleaner is reduced, but the suction and cleaning efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of vacuum cleanerVSAvoidsuction power
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The vortex finder is removed from the cyclone chamber, eliminating the component that created back pressure and restricted airflow. This extraction allows the smaller motor to operate more efficiently by removing the flow restriction, thereby maintaining suction power while reducing overall system weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The design changes the airflow parameters by eliminating the vortex finder, which alters the pressure distribution and flow velocity within the cyclone chamber. This parameter change enables smaller motors to achieve adequate suction by optimizing the airflow path and reducing restrictive elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a traditional vortex finder is used to prevent hair and larger particles from exiting, then particle separation is improved, but back pressure increases and airflow velocity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle separation efficiencyVSAvoidairflow velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The vortex finder is completely removed from the cyclone chamber, eliminating the source of back pressure. The screen alone is sufficient to prevent hair and larger particles from exiting while allowing free airflow through the cyclone chamber, thus maintaining high airflow velocity without compromising particle separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A screen is used instead of a solid vortex finder structure. The screen's porous nature allows airflow to pass through freely while still capturing hair and larger particles, thereby reducing back pressure and maintaining airflow velocity while achieving effective particle separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Productivity

If the vortex finder is eliminated to reduce back pressure and improve airflow, then cleaning efficiency is improved, but the ability to prevent hair and larger particles from exiting may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning efficiencyVSAvoidparticle separation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vortex finder is removed to eliminate back pressure and improve airflow velocity, directly enhancing cleaning efficiency. The screen is positioned to provide the necessary particle separation function, capturing hair and larger particles while allowing free airflow through the cyclone chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The screen serves as the primary particle separation mechanism, using its porous structure to filter hair and larger particles from the airflow. This approach maintains effective particle separation while allowing unrestricted airflow through the cyclone chamber, thereby preserving cleaning efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances cleaning efficiency by maintaining airflow velocity and reducing back pressure, while also minimizing the weight and power requirements of the suction motor, particularly in battery-operated vacuum cleaners.

Implementation Method 1

Air is drawn into the vacuum cleaners through a dirty air inlet and conveyed to a cyclone inlet. The rotation of the air in the cyclone results in some of the particulate matter in the airflow stream being disentrained from the airflow stream.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclone separation: Cyclone Separation

Implementation Method 2

The rotation of the air in the cyclone results in some of the particulate matter in the airflow stream being disentrained from the airflow stream.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 3

a screen is provided around the opening of the vortex finder to prevent hair and larger dirt particles from exiting the vacuum cleaner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical filtration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS10827890B2Surface cleaning apparatus
Publication Date: 2020.11.10 OMACHRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INC
  • US10827890B2 patent drawing
  • US10827890B2 patent drawing
  • US10827890B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surface cleaning apparatus has a dirt collection chamber that is external to a cyclone chamber. The dirt collection chamber has a sidewall having a first sidewall portion that extends outwardly away from the cyclone chamber sidewall and a second sidewall portion that extends from the first sidewall portion towards a distal end of the dirt collection chamber. The cyclone chamber has a dirt outlet that faces the cyclone chamber sidewall.