Cyclone Guide Vanes for Separation Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cyclone separators face challenges in achieving high separation efficiency without significant pressure drop increases, particularly in designs with axial inlet configurations where tangential feed components are absent.

Innovation Solution

The cyclone incorporates shrouded guide vanes with a geometrical form featuring at least three edges, where one edge is fixed and the other two are not, with a distance ratio greater than 1.25, allowing particles to be directed towards the outer cyclone walls and reducing attraction to the inner vortex, enhancing separation efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the inlet velocity is increased to improve separation efficiency, then the separation efficiency is improved, but the pressure drop increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of guide vanes, specifically setting the outer chord length to be 1.05 to 1.5 times the inner chord length (c2/c1 = 1.05...1.5), which optimizes the flow distribution and reduces pressure drop while maintaining separation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The guide vanes are designed with non-uniform chord lengths where the outer chord (c2) is deliberately made longer than the inner chord (c1), creating local geometric variation that optimizes flow guidance and reduces energy loss in specific regions of the cyclone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the vortex finder diameter is decreased to improve separation efficiency, then the separation efficiency is improved, but the pressure drop increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the vortex finder diameter ratio (d/D) to be between 0.15 and 0.35, which balances separation efficiency and pressure drop by controlling the upward flow velocity and particle escape through the vortex finder

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If additional installations are added to redirect incoming flow to improve separation efficiency, then the separation efficiency is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide vanes are positioned upstream to preliminarily redirect the incoming flow before it enters the main separation zone, creating favorable flow conditions in advance and reducing the need for additional flow control devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The guide vanes serve multiple functions: they redirect incoming flow, generate swirl, and optimize flow distribution, thereby achieving improved separation efficiency without requiring separate dedicated components for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves separation efficiency by directing particles towards the cyclone walls, reducing pressure drop and optimizing radial and circumferential velocities, particularly beneficial for axial cyclones and tangential cyclones alike.

Implementation Method 1

The fluid together with the solids or liquids contained therein is fed from the fluid source via the feed channel into the housing of the cyclone. In the interior of the cyclone the main portion of the volume stream of the fluid (about 90 %) is forced as a main stream onto a helical path, so that due to the centrifugal force the particles to be separated are thrown towards the wall of the housing.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

As the liquid flow in a helical pattern, beginning at the top (wide end) of the cyclone and ending at the bottom (narrow) end is the essential part of the separation efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHelical flow: Vortex Ring

Data Source

PatentEP3648896B1Cyclone with guide vanes
Publication Date: 2021.05.26 METSO OUTOTEC FINLAND OY
  • EP3648896B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1c
  • EP3648896B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

The invention relates to a cyclone for the separation of solid particles and/or at least one liquid from a fluid, featuring a housing (2, 3), an inlet opening (6) for introducing the fluid together with the solid particles and/or the at least one liquid into the housing (2, 3), a discharge port (4) for the solid particles and/or the at least one liquid, a dip tube (12) for discharging the fluid from the housing (2,3), and at least two guide vanes (10a, 10b). Each guiding vanes (10a, 10b) shows a geometrical form with at least three edges e1, e2, e3. Further, each guide vane (10a, 10b) is directly or indirectly fixed to the housing (2, 3) with at least one edge e3 at a fixing point, whereby an area a is defined as the cross-sectional area of the housing (2, 3) intersecting the fixed edges e3. In addition, each guide vane (10a, 10b) shows at least two edges e1 and e2 which are not fixed to the housing (2, 3), whereby the first edge e1 has a distance d1 and the second edge e2 has a distance d2, and whereby d1 < d2 to the centerline c of the housing (2, 3). According to the invention, the first edge e1 shows a distance 11 to the area a and the second edge e2 shows a distance 12, whereby 12 > 1,25*11.