Cyclonic Food Packaging Separation and Granulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for processing packaged food products are inefficient, as they require manual separation from packaging, which is costly and time-consuming, and can lead to degradation of the food product, especially farinaceous materials, affecting texture and quality. Additionally, existing technologies do not effectively recycle packaging materials.

Innovation Solution

A cyclonic process that simultaneously separates packaging from food content while grinding, using compressed air to disintegrate the packaging and preserve the food product's structural integrity, allowing for the production of granulated food and recyclable packaging fragments without mechanical contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If manual separation of food product from packaging is performed, then the food product can be recovered for reuse, but the process becomes costly and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood product recoveryVSAvoidseparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical separation with an automated system using expanding gas (such as CO2) to inflate packaging and mechanically eject it from the food product. This substitution of manual labor with automated pneumatic mechanisms dramatically reduces separation time and labor costs while maintaining high food product recovery rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes pneumatic principles by introducing expanding gas into the packaging material to create internal pressure that forces the packaging away from the food product. This pneumatic mechanism enables automatic, rapid separation without direct mechanical contact with the food, solving both the time and cost issues associated with manual separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional grinding or milling operations are used on packaged food, then the packaging can be removed, but the food product undergoes gelatinization and structural degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging removalVSAvoidfood product structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs packaging removal as a preliminary action before any grinding or milling operations. By using expanding gas to eject the packaging intact from the food product, the food never contacts the packaging during grinding, thereby preventing gelatinization and structural degradation that would occur if packaged food were ground together.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the packaging material from the food product through pneumatic ejection, separating the two components before any further processing. This extraction ensures that subsequent grinding operations only affect the food product without the complicating presence of packaging materials, preserving food structure and preventing unwanted chemical changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Shape

If packaged food is ground with mechanical parts, then size reduction is achieved, but the packaging contaminates the food product

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle sizeVSAvoidfood grade quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces direct mechanical contact between grinding components and packaged food with a pneumatic separation system. The expanding gas ejects the packaging away from the food before grinding, ensuring that only food-grade materials contact the food product during size reduction, thereby maintaining food safety and quality reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention segments the processing into distinct stages: first pneumatic separation of packaging from food, then independent grinding of the food product. This segmentation prevents packaging contamination of the food while achieving the desired particle size, ensuring food grade quality is maintained throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process reduces waste, preserves the functional and organoleptic qualities of the food, enables efficient recycling of packaging, and minimizes process complexity and costs, producing a shelf-stable granular food product suitable for reuse in food production.

Implementation Method 1

a cyclonic process that simultaneously separates packaging from food content while grinding, using compressed air to disintegrate the packaging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclone separation: Cyclone Separation

Implementation Method 2

the break down of the package occurs while it is in the cyclone sufficient to release the food contents. Packaging and liberated food contents are acted upon by non-mechanical disintegration forces generated within the cyclone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressed air disintegration: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP1733811B8Process for packaging separation and granulation of processed food content thereof, and products and uses thereof
Publication Date: 2009.11.04 INTERCONTINENTAL GREAT BRANDS LLC

AI summary

A process for grinding packaged processed food and simultaneously separating its packaging in a single unit operation in a continuous, short-duration manner. Grinding may be effected without the need for moving mechanical parts. The granulated food product obtained from the grinding treatment of the packaged processed food is functionally suitable for re-use in food production lines and the packaging material fragments may be further recycled.