Cyclonic Particle Separation Air Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cyclonic particle separation apparatuses in additive manufacturing environments face inefficiencies due to changes in air pressure caused by moving components, leading to reduced air flow and separation efficiency, especially when particles of specific sizes are involved.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a pressure sensor and cyclonic air flow controller that adjusts the air inflow from outside the fabrication chamber to maintain a constant total air flow through the cyclonic separation chamber, compensating for changes in air pressure and flow rates by controlling the aperture size of valves and fan speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If air flow rate through the cyclonic separation chamber is increased to improve particle separation efficiency, then separation efficiency improves, but the system becomes sensitive to pressure changes caused by moving components, leading to flow instability and reduced reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle separation efficiencyVSAvoidair flow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a feedback control mechanism where a pressure sensor continuously monitors the pressure differential across the cyclonic separation chamber. When pressure changes indicate variations in air flow rate, the controller automatically adjusts the inlet valve aperture to maintain the desired air flow rate, ensuring stable and reliable operation despite external disturbances from moving components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the aperture size of the inlet valve as a control parameter to compensate for pressure variations. By adjusting this parameter in response to real-time pressure measurements, the system maintains consistent air flow rate and separation efficiency even when operating conditions change due to moving components within the chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the aperture size of inlet valves is reduced to control air flow rate, then air flow rate decreases and separation efficiency may improve for specific particle sizes, but the total air flow through the system decreases, reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle separation precisionVSAvoidtotal air flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic control of the inlet valve aperture rather than a fixed setting. The aperture size is continuously adjusted based on real-time pressure feedback to optimize the air flow rate for separating specific particle sizes while maintaining sufficient total air flow. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to adapt to different operating conditions and particle size requirements without sacrificing overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system operates with variable air pressure conditions due to moving components, then operational flexibility is maintained, but air flow rate through the cyclone varies, reducing separation efficiency and potentially causing clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidseparation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system continuously monitors pressure variations caused by moving components and automatically adjusts the inlet valve aperture to maintain constant air flow rate through the cyclonic separator. This ensures that separation efficiency remains high and consistent regardless of the operational phase or position of moving components, while still allowing the system to operate flexibly throughout the entire manufacturing cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution maintains the efficiency of particle separation by ensuring a consistent total air flow, preventing clogging and ensuring filtered air quality, even with varying air pressure conditions caused by moving components within the chamber.

Implementation Method 1

Cyclonic particle separation apparatus may be used to separate particles from an air flow. In examples of such apparatus, air may be drawn into a cylindrical or conical chamber and caused to flow in a spiral. Particles suspended in the air, being heavier, move towards the edge of the chamber. The particles then tend to strike the chamber walls, fall and collect at the bottom of the chamber.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclone separation: Cyclone Separation

Implementation Method 2

Particles suspended in the air, being heavier, move towards the edge of the chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS11266937B2Air flow rates in cyclonic particle separation chambers
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 PERIDOT PRINT LLC
  • US11266937B2 patent drawing
  • US11266937B2 patent drawing
  • US11266937B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example, an air filtration apparatus includes a cyclonic particle separation chamber having a first inlet to draw air from a first region, second inlet to draw air from a second region, and an exhaust port. The air filtration apparatus may further include a pressure sensor to sense a pressure of the first region, and a cyclonic air flow controller. The cyclonic air flow controller may control an air inflow received via the second inlet in response to an output from the pressure sensor to maintain a total air flow rate via the exhaust port.