Cylinder Bore Machining with Load-Based Shape Inversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing round hole machining methods for cylinder blocks in engines face challenges in maintaining machining accuracy due to varying machining loads caused by edge tool wear, leading to increased costs and cycle times.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that acquire machining load data to predict the machining shape, allowing for the inversion of the predicted shape to correct for elastic deformations, enabling accurate machining regardless of edge tool wear, and reducing the frequency of tool replacement and cycle time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the machining load is increased to improve machining efficiency, then productivity is improved, but machining accuracy is lowered due to elastic deformation of the work

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining efficiencyVSAvoidmachining accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of the workpiece shape before machining, predicts the elastic deformation that will occur during machining based on the machining load, and pre-compensates for this deformation by adjusting the machining path. This preliminary action allows the system to maintain high machining accuracy even when using high machining loads for improved productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the actual workpiece shape is measured before machining, this measurement feedback is used to predict deformation, and the predicted deformation is then used to adjust the machining parameters. This closed-loop feedback system enables the maintenance of machining accuracy while allowing flexible adjustment of machining load for productivity optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If the edge tool is replaced frequently to maintain machining accuracy, then machining accuracy is maintained, but cost and cycle time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement and prediction of elastic deformation before machining, allowing it to compensate for tool wear effects through software correction rather than physical tool replacement. This preliminary computational action extends tool life while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the machining parameters dynamically based on measured workpiece geometry and predicted deformation, adjusting cutting paths and depths to account for tool wear. This parameter adaptation allows continued use of worn tools while maintaining machining accuracy, reducing tool replacement frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the allowance for cutting is reduced to decrease machining load, then machining accuracy is improved, but other steps are affected and cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement and deformation prediction, enabling it to use larger cutting allowances while compensating for the resulting elastic deformation through computational correction. This preliminary computational compensation allows aggressive material removal without sacrificing final accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical approach of using small allowances to prevent deformation with a computational approach that predicts and compensates for deformation. This substitution of computational correction for mechanical constraint allows larger allowances and faster machining while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures accurate round hole machining regardless of edge tool wear, reduces tool replacement frequency, and minimizes the need for reduced cutting allowances, thereby enhancing productivity.

Implementation Method 1

When a pressing force (hereinafter referred to as a machining load) produced by the edge tool is increased, the work is elastically deformed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9914177B2Round hole machining method and round-hole machining device
Publication Date: 2018.03.13 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9914177B2 patent drawing
  • US9914177B2 patent drawing
  • US9914177B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A round hole machining method and a round-hole machining device in which machining can be accurately performed regardless of the wear of an edge tool. A non-round hole machining device includes: a machining load data acquisition section for obtaining machining load data corresponding to a machining load acting on the cutting edge of a cutting tool when boring a bore in a cylinder block; a machined shape prediction section for predicting a machined shape of the workpiece by utilizing the obtained machining load data and elastic deformation amounts at respective positions on the workpiece; and a motor control section for machining the workpiece so as to form an inverted shape, that is, a shape formed by inverting the predicted machined shape with respect to a target shape.