Cylindrical Battery Housing Parameters for Impact Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cylindrical secondary batteries face issues with axial movement during vibration and impact tests, leading to failure due to insufficient housing strength, which reduces their impact test pass rate and energy density.

Innovation Solution

Control the thickness and yield strength of the housing within specific ranges (0.3 < 3a + 0.001b < 1.8, 0.05 ≤ a ≤ 0.5, 150 ≤ b ≤ 350 MPa) and adjust the gap and diameter of the electrode assembly to enhance mechanical protection, using materials like 45# carbon steel and copper foil for the housing and negative electrode current collector.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the housing thickness is increased to improve impact resistance, then the impact test pass rate improves, but the energy density deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidenergy density
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by establishing specific mathematical relationships between housing thickness (a) and yield strength (b), where 0.3 ≤ 3a + 0.001b ≤ 1.8 and 150 ≤ b ≤ 350 MPa. This quantitative approach optimizes the housing parameters to achieve both adequate impact resistance and acceptable energy density, resolving the contradiction between protection and space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If swelling tape is added to increase friction, then the impact test pass rate improves, but the energy density deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact test pass rateVSAvoidenergy density
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the swelling tape from the battery structure, replacing it with a housing design that achieves impact protection through optimized dimensional and material parameters rather than additional friction-increasing components. This eliminates the need for extra space-consuming elements while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If the housing yield strength is increased to prevent housing failure, then the impact test pass rate improves, but the manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes an optimal range for housing yield strength (150 ≤ b ≤ 350 MPa) and its relationship with thickness (0.3 ≤ 3a + 0.001b ≤ 1.8), providing clear manufacturing guidelines that balance strength requirements with production feasibility, avoiding excessive complexity while ensuring adequate protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4704228A1Cylindrical secondary battery and electronic device
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 XIAMEN AMPACE TECH LTD
  • EP4704228A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4704228A1 patent drawing
  • EP4704228A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application provides a cylindrical secondary battery and an electronic device, where the cylindrical secondary battery includes an electrode assembly and a housing accommodating the electrode assembly, the electrode assembly including a positive electrode plate, a negative electrode plate, and a separator disposed between the positive electrode plate and the negative electrode plate. A thickness of the housing is a mm, a yield strength of the housing is b MPa, and a and b satisfy: 0.3 &lt; 3a + 0.001b &lt; 1.8, and 0.05 ≤ a ≤ 0.5.