Cylindrical Flame Body Burner for Hydrogen Flashback Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing burner devices face challenges with flashback risks and efficiency when using hydrogen-containing fuels, particularly in heating systems and service water supply systems, due to the higher flame propagation speed of hydrogen compared to conventional fuels, and the use of flame arresters compromises efficiency and space.

Innovation Solution

A burner device design featuring a cylindrically shaped flame body with a central air flow channel and a fuel supply device that separates the mixing region from the flow channel, ensuring a homogeneous air-fuel mixture and reducing the volume of the air-fuel mixture within the burner, thereby minimizing flashback risks and enhancing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If flame arresting devices are installed to prevent flashback, then safety is improved, but installation space increases and mixing efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful element (flame arrester) is completely removed from the system. Instead of adding a flame arrester to prevent flashback, the patent redesigns the mixing area geometry and air-fuel mixture formation process to inherently prevent flashback conditions, extracting the safety function from a separate component to the overall system design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the mixing area, specifically reducing its volume and optimizing the air-fuel mixture composition. By controlling the mixture to be leaner and reducing the space where flammable mixtures can form, the flashback risk is eliminated without requiring additional safety components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If flame arresting devices are installed to prevent flashback, then safety is improved, but mixing efficiency deteriorates due to additional flow resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidmixing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful element (flame arrester) that causes flow resistance is completely removed. The safety function is achieved through geometric design of the mixing area and control of air-fuel mixture parameters, eliminating the need for flow-resistance-inducing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the air-fuel mixture parameters (composition, velocity, temperature) and mixing area geometry to achieve both safety and efficient mixing. By controlling the mixture to be leaner and optimizing flow patterns, the design achieves safety without compromising mixing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If supply pressures are increased to compensate for flow resistance, then mixing efficiency is maintained, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The source of flow resistance (flame arrester) is removed, eliminating the need for additional pressure compensation. The system maintains mixing efficiency through optimized geometry and flow patterns rather than increased energy input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the flow parameters and mixing area design to achieve efficient mixing at lower supply pressures. By changing the geometric parameters and flow conditions rather than increasing pressure, energy consumption is reduced while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If burner devices are designed for conventional fossil fuels, then they operate efficiently with those fuels, but they are not suitable for hydrogen-containing fuels due to higher flame propagation speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidfuel compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The burner device is designed with universal adaptability to handle different fuel types including hydrogen-containing fuels and conventional fossil fuels. The mixing area geometry and air-fuel mixture formation process are optimized to accommodate the higher flame propagation speed of hydrogen while maintaining efficient combustion for all fuel types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts the operating parameters (air-fuel ratio, mixing area volume, flow velocities) to accommodate hydrogen-containing fuels with their higher flame propagation speed. By changing these parameters, the burner achieves both safety (flashback prevention) and efficient combustion across different fuel types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves stable and efficient combustion with a reduced risk of flashback, allowing for safe and efficient operation with hydrogen-containing fuels without the need for flame arresters, and can be integrated into heat generators and heating systems for effective thermal energy transfer.

Implementation Method 1

a flow channel running centrally in the interior along a longitudinal central axis of the flame body for supplying air into the mixing area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Implementation Method 2

a fuel supply device arranged at least partially in the interior for introducing fuel into a mixing area for mixing the fuel with air to form an air-fuel mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 3

the fuel supply device surrounds the flow channel at least in the radial direction, in particular completely surrounds the flow channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 4

for supplying heat energy by combustion of an air-fuel mixture, wherein the fuel in particular contains hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP4491946A1Burner device, heat generator, heating system and domestic water supply system
Publication Date: 2025.01.15 VIESSMANN HOLDING INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • EP4491946A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2B
  • EP4491946A1 patent drawingFigure 3A~5B
  • EP4491946A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a burner device 100 for supplying heat energy by combustion of an air-fuel mixture, wherein the fuel B contains, in particular, hydrogen. The burner device 100 comprises a generally cylindrical flame body 1, which has an outer combustion surface 17 formed on a cylindrical shell of the flame body 1, on which the combustion of the air-fuel mixture takes place, wherein the combustion surface 17 is connected via through-openings 16 in the cylindrical shell to an interior space 11 at least partially enclosed by the flame body 1. Furthermore, the burner device 100 comprises a fuel supply device 2 arranged at least partially in the interior space 11 for introducing fuel into a mixing area 15 for mixing the fuel B with air L to form the air-fuel mixture, wherein the mixing area 15 is formed in the interior space 11 between the fuel supply device 2 and the flame body 1.and a flow channel 3 running centrally in the interior 11 along a longitudinal central axis 14 of the flame body 1 for supplying air into the mixing area 15, which is at least partially enclosed by the fuel supply device 2.