Cylindrical MEA Gas Decomposition Component with Preheating Pipe

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas decomposition methods for ammonia, such as chemical neutralization, incineration with catalysts, and thermal decomposition, require external energy, chemicals, and periodic catalyst replacement, leading to high running costs and large apparatus sizes, with challenges in reducing size and enhancing efficiency due to heating limitations and sealing issues in cylindrical membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs).

Innovation Solution

A gas decomposition component with a cylindrical MEA featuring a preheating pipe to efficiently heat gases before introduction, a shared heater and preheating pipe for multiple components, and a gas guide pipe to reverse gas flow direction, enhancing heating efficiency and sealing reliability, while using conductive materials and porous metal bodies to improve electrical connections and contact areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the gas flow rate is increased to decompose a large amount of gas, then the treatment capacity is improved, but the gas is not sufficiently heated and decomposition efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas treatment capacityVSAvoidgas decomposition efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a preheating pipe that heats the gas before it enters the cylindrical MEA. This preliminary heating action ensures that even at high flow rates, the gas reaches the required temperature for efficient decomposition, resolving the contradiction between high throughput and maintained efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Volume of moving object

If the size of the cylindrical MEA is reduced, then the apparatus size is decreased, but the heating efficiency of the gas is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecylindrical MEA sizeVSAvoidgas heating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By preheating the gas in a separate preheating pipe before it enters the compact cylindrical MEA, the system maintains effective heating in a reduced-size device. The preheating action compensates for the smaller heating surface area in the compact MEA design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the entirety of the cylindrical MEA is kept at high temperature for gas decomposition, then the decomposition reaction is promoted, but the sealing effect between end portions and connection members degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas decomposition rateVSAvoidsealing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the heating function into two segments: a preheating pipe for initial heating and the cylindrical MEA for final decomposition. This segmentation allows the connection members to be positioned in the preheating section where temperatures are lower, preserving sealing reliability while maintaining high decomposition rates in the MEA

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The preheating pipe acts as an intermediary component that handles the high-temperature heating function separately from the cylindrical MEA. This intermediary structure protects the sealing interfaces by keeping them away from the highest temperature zones, maintaining both decomposition efficiency and sealing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves high gas decomposition efficiency, reduces running costs, and allows for compact apparatus design by efficiently heating gases and improving sealing reliability, thereby increasing treatment performance and reducing apparatus size.

Implementation Method 1

the temperature of the gaseous fluid containing the gas is preferably increased as high as possible and the gas is supplied to the first electrode layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

a preheating pipe through which the first gas to be introduced into the first gas channel passes beforehand to be preheated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPreheating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

ammonia is decomposed with a phosphoric acid fuel cell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reaction: Fuel Cell

Data Source

PatentUS9132384B2Gas decomposition component, power generation apparatus, and method for decomposing gas
Publication Date: 2015.09.15 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US9132384B2 patent drawing
  • US9132384B2 patent drawing
  • US9132384B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a gas decomposition component, a power generation apparatus including the gas decomposition component, and a method for decomposing a gas. A gas decomposition component includes a cylindrical MEA including a first electrode layer, a cylindrical solid electrolyte layer, and a second electrode layer in order from an inside toward an outside, in a layered structure; a first gas channel through which a first gas that is decomposed flows, the first gas channel being disposed inside the cylindrical MEA; and a second gas channel through which a second gas flows, the second gas channel being disposed outside the cylindrical MEA, wherein the gas decomposition component further includes a heater for heating the entirety of the component; and a preheating pipe through which the first gas to be introduced into the first gas channel passes beforehand to be preheated.