Cylindrical STT-MRAM Stack with Selective Insulating Cap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spin-transfer torque magnetoresistive random access memory (STT-MRAM) technologies face challenges in optimizing the structure and fabrication process to enhance write margin and chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) loading effects while maintaining lower power consumption and faster operating speeds.

Innovation Solution

The proposed magnetic memory device structure includes a substrate with distinct dielectric layers and via plugs, cylindrical memory stacks with magnetic tunnel junctions, and an insulating cap layer, along with specific spacer and interconnect configurations, allowing for improved electrical connections and CMP compatibility, and avoiding voids in the via forming region.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional planar MTJ structure is used, then the fabrication process is simple, but the write margin is insufficient and power consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrite marginVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a cylindrical MTJ structure instead of a conventional planar configuration. The cylindrical shape provides enhanced magnetic anisotropy and improved write margin through the perpendicular magnetization scheme, while the curved geometry naturally facilitates stress engineering for better TMR ratio without requiring additional complex layers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple dielectric layers with different materials are used to optimize CMP performance, then CMP loading effects are improved, but the fabrication process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCMP loading effectVSAvoidfabrication process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-layer dielectric structure where each layer (first dielectric layer, second dielectric layer, and interlayer dielectric) has optimized material composition and thickness tailored to specific regional requirements. The first and second dielectric layers beneath the cylindrical MTJ are engineered with different properties than the interlayer dielectric to control CMP loading effects locally, allowing precise planarization control without uniform process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes composite dielectric structures combining different materials (e.g., silicon oxide, silicon nitride, low-k materials) in specific layer configurations. These composite layers provide differentiated CMP response characteristics, enabling better loading effect management during chemical mechanical polishing while maintaining manufacturability through standard semiconductor fabrication processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If the insulating cap layer is continuously disposed over the entire substrate including via forming regions, then electrical isolation is improved, but voids form during fabrication and cause shorting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical isolationVSAvoidvia formation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent strategically removes the insulating cap layer from specific via forming regions where conductive vias need to be formed. This selective extraction allows via plugs to be formed directly to the underlying metal layers without the insulating cap layer interfering, preventing void formation and ensuring proper electrical connectivity, while the insulating cap layer remains in other regions to provide necessary electrical isolation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Use of energy by moving object

If lower power consumption is achieved through optimized MTJ structure, then energy efficiency is improved, but operating speed may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidoperating speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes multiple parameters simultaneously including the thickness and composition of magnetic layers, the tunnel barrier thickness, and the cylindrical geometry dimensions. These parameter optimizations enable lower switching currents (reducing power consumption) while maintaining fast switching speeds through enhanced spin-polarized tunneling efficiency and reduced magnetic damping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the write margin and CMP loading effects, ensuring efficient electrical connections and preventing shorting between conductive vias and memory stacks, thereby improving the overall performance and reliability of STT-MRAM devices.

Implementation Method 1

magnetic elements (MTJ elements) having MTJs utilizing a tunnel magneto resistance (TMR) effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTunnel magneto resistance (TMR) effect: Magnetoresistance

Implementation Method 2

spin-transfer torque magnetoresistive random access memory (STT-MRAM)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin-transfer torque:

Data Source

PatentUS10903269B2Magnetic memory device and fabrication method thereof
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP
  • US10903269B2 patent drawing
  • US10903269B2 patent drawing
  • US10903269B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A magnetic memory device includes a first dielectric layer on a substrate, first and second via plugs in the first dielectric layer, first and second cylindrical memory stacks on the first and second via plugs, respectively, and an insulating cap layer conformally disposed on the first dielectric layer and on sidewalls of the first and second cylindrical memory stacks. The insulating cap layer is not disposed in a logic area and a via forming region between the first and second cylindrical memory stacks.