Cylindrical-Segment Cutting Insert for Lower Burr Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cutting inserts with straight edges generate undesirable burrs during machining, leading to increased deburring time and costs, and existing cutting insert designs do not effectively reduce burr formation.

Innovation Solution

A cutting insert with a substantially horizontal cylindrical segment shape featuring convex top and bottom cutting edges, a flat side, and a hole at the center of the flat side, which reduces burr formation by altering the cutting edge geometry and stress distribution during machining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional straight cutting edges are used, then the cutting insert structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but burr formation increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting insert manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidburr formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curvature to the cutting edge by introducing a convex side with a defined radius of curvature (R1) that transitions smoothly from the top surface to the bottom surface. This curved geometry modifies the stress distribution during cutting, reducing burr formation while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standard machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the cutting insert by introducing specific curvature radii (R1 for the convex side, R2 for the transition surface) and defined angles (α for the top surface, β for the bottom surface). These parameter modifications optimize the cutting action to minimize burr formation while preserving ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If burr formation is reduced through additional processing, then manufacturing precision improves, but productivity decreases due to increased deburring time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by designing the cutting insert with built-in burr-reducing geometry before the cutting operation occurs. The convex side and transition surface are pre-configured with specific curvatures and angles that prevent excessive burr formation during machining, eliminating or minimizing the need for subsequent deburring operations and thereby maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the cutting edge geometry is modified to reduce burrs, then burr thickness decreases, but the cutting insert design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburr thicknessVSAvoidcutting insert geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by modifying only specific regions of the cutting insert geometry. The convex side with radius R1 and the transition surface with radius R2 are localized modifications to the cutting edge area, while the rest of the insert structure remains simple and unchanged. This targeted approach reduces burr thickness without significantly increasing overall design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If deburring operations are performed manually to remove burrs, then edge quality improves, but labor intensity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge finish qualityVSAvoiddeburring cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by designing the cutting insert to automatically minimize burr formation through its inherent geometry. The convex side and transition surface work together during the cutting process to produce cleaner edges without requiring external deburring operations, thereby eliminating time loss and reducing labor intensity while maintaining edge finish quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11433460B1Cutting insert
Publication Date: 2022.09.06 PRINCE MOHAMMAD BIN FAHD UNIV
  • US11433460B1 patent drawing
  • US11433460B1 patent drawing
  • US11433460B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cutting insert of a substantially horizontal cylindrical segment shape may include top and bottom surfaces having a circular segment shape. The cutting insert may include a convex side and a flat side. The cutting insert may include a top cutting edge which is formed where the convex side and the top surface meet, and a bottom cutting edge which is formed where the convex side and the bottom surface meet. The cutting insert may include a hole extending from the convex side towards the flat side. The hole may be positioned at a center of a surface of the flat side.