Cylindrical Slicing Guide with Perpendicular Slots

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food slicing devices for domestic use are delicate, expensive, difficult to clean, and require significant storage space, while commercial devices are unaffordable and also challenging to maintain, lacking a durable and affordable alternative for slicing perishable foods like lettuce.

Innovation Solution

A novel slicing guide apparatus with a hollow cylindrical frame featuring pairs of vertical slots and indicia for guiding a cutting utensil to slice food items efficiently, designed for durability, easy cleaning, and low-cost replacement without disassembly, using materials like plastics, metals, or wood.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If multi-blade slicing devices are used for domestic lettuce slicing, then slicing capability is provided, but the devices are delicate, expensive, and difficult to clean

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslicing capabilityVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The slicing device is segmented into a reusable durable frame structure and replaceable blade sets. The frame provides structural integrity and durability, while blade sets can be independently replaced when dull or damaged, resolving the contradiction between providing slicing capability and ensuring durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade sets are designed to be disposable or easily replaceable components, while the main frame is recovered and reused. This allows the durable frame to be maintained long-term while blades are replaced as needed, addressing both slicing capability and durability concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Productivity

If whole-head lettuce slicing devices are used, then high volume slicing is achieved, but they are unaffordable and require significant storage space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslicing volumeVSAvoidstorage space
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The device accepts different blade set configurations that can be swapped based on slicing needs. Users can configure blade density and arrangement to match the required slicing volume, allowing the same physical device to adapt to different productivity requirements without requiring multiple dedicated devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The frame structure is designed as a universal platform that can accommodate various blade set configurations for different slicing volumes and food types. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate devices for different slicing needs, reducing storage space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If multi-blade sets are used, then slicing function is provided, but they must be disposed and replaced when loose or dull

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslicing functionVSAvoidmaintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The slicing system is divided into a permanent frame and replaceable blade sets. When blades become loose or dull, only the blade set needs to be replaced rather than servicing the entire device, significantly simplifying maintenance while preserving the slicing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Blade sets are designed as low-cost, easily replaceable components that can be disposed of or replaced without specialized service. This makes maintenance trivial while the slicing function remains continuously available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Reliability

If restaurant-grade lettuce cutting machines are used, then durable slicing is achieved, but they are expensive and difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The device separates the durable frame (invested once) from the blade sets (replaced periodically). This segmentation allows the main structure to be built durably at low cost while blades are simple, inexpensive replacement parts, achieving restaurant-grade durability at domestic prices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame is designed for long-term recovery and reuse, while blades are treated as consumables. This approach concentrates durability investment in the permanent structure while keeping replacement parts inexpensive, resolving the contradiction between durability and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS11065774B2Slicing guide apparatus
Publication Date: 2021.07.20 LOWETZ FREDERICK ANTHONY
  • US11065774B2 patent drawing
  • US11065774B2 patent drawing
  • US11065774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A slicing guide apparatus for reducing perishable foods into small, bite-sized pieces, the apparatus having a hollow cylindrical frame defining an open top end, an open bottom end, at least a first set of pair of elongated, vertical slots, at least a second set of pair of elongated, vertical slots that are perpendicular in orientation to the at least first set of pair of elongated, vertical slots, wherein the width of the at least first set of pair of elongated, vertical slots and of the at least second set of pair of elongated, vertical slots permits a cutting utensil to pass therethrough, at least one elongated, vertical rib that protrudes outward from the exterior of the frame and indicia affixed to the frame.