Cylindrical End Position Sorting Layout for Piece Goods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sorting technologies for piece goods, such as multiaxial industrial robots and horizontal articulated-arm robots, are complex and limited in throughput and vertical reach, while portal systems are restricted in the number of vertical end positions they can access, making efficient automatic sorting challenging.

Innovation Solution

A sorting layout with a cylindrical end position arrangement and a sorting mechanism that includes a portal robot, linear transport mechanism, rotation mechanism, lift system, and multiple pick-up elements, allowing for efficient and reliable sorting into multiple end positions arranged vertically and horizontally, with a control device to coordinate sorting based on piece good characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If multiaxial industrial robots or horizontal articulated-arm robots are used for sorting, then automatic sorting capability is achieved, but device complexity increases and throughput is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic sorting capabilityVSAvoidrobot design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sorting system is segmented into a portal robot for horizontal movement, a linear transport mechanism for vertical movement, and multiple pick-up elements for individual piece good handling. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The portal robot serves multiple functions: it transports piece goods horizontally, positions them for vertical transport, and coordinates with multiple pick-up elements. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized mechanisms, simplifying the overall device design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Extent of automation

If multiaxial industrial robots are used for sorting, then automatic sorting capability is achieved, but throughput is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic sorting capabilityVSAvoidsorting throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from horizontal-only robot movement to a three-dimensional configuration with horizontal portal robot movement combined with vertical linear transport mechanism movement. This dimensional expansion allows multiple piece goods to be sorted simultaneously at different heights, significantly increasing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The linear transport mechanism continuously moves piece goods vertically while the portal robot continuously moves horizontally, creating overlapping operational cycles. This continuity eliminates idle time between sorting operations, maximizing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Length of moving object

If portal systems are used for sorting, then horizontal transport capability is improved, but the number of vertical end positions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehorizontal transport rangeVSAvoidnumber of vertical end positions
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The linear transport mechanism is nested within the portal robot structure, with the lift system integrated into the vertical support columns. This nested configuration allows the horizontal portal system to accommodate vertical transport capability, effectively combining both dimensions in a compact arrangement that increases the number of accessible end positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic pick-up elements that can be positioned at multiple vertical levels along the linear transport mechanism. These elements can be activated selectively to deliver piece goods to different vertical end positions, making the system adaptable to varying sorting requirements without requiring fixed dedicated positions for each destination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12023716B2Sorting layout for piece goods with cylindrical end position device
Publication Date: 2024.07.02 KERBER SUPPLY CHAIN LOGISTICS GESELLSCHAFT MITT BESCHLENKTEL HAFZUNG
  • US12023716B2 patent drawing
  • US12023716B2 patent drawing
  • US12023716B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sorting layout for piece goods contains a sorting mechanism and an end position configuration. The end position configuration contains a plurality of end positions, which are arranged in cylinder fashion. The end position configuration also has end positions arranged one on top of another. The sorting mechanism is adapted to pick up piece goods being sorted and to sort them into any one of the end positions of the end position configuration.