Cylindrical Robotic Vacuum With Large Wheels for Obstacle Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic vacuums face challenges in navigating obstacles and maintaining energy efficiency, requiring increased wheel size for better navigation and reduced energy consumption to enhance autonomy and performance.

Innovation Solution

A cylindrical robotic vacuum design with large wheels on either end, a counterweight system, and a servomotor for balance, along with energy-efficient components to improve navigation and reduce energy usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If wheel size is increased to improve obstacle navigation capability, then the ability to travel over bumps and obstacles is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle navigation capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a cylindrical body shape with large diameter wheels that are proportionally larger than the body diameter. This curved, cylindrical configuration allows the vacuum to roll over bumps and obstacles more effectively compared to traditional box-shaped designs, as the circular geometry naturally accommodates elevation changes and irregular surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the critical parameter of wheel diameter relative to body diameter. By making the wheels larger than the cylindrical body diameter (unconventional proportion), the device gains enhanced obstacle-crawling capability. This parameter change transforms the navigation performance without requiring additional complex mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If wheel size is increased to reduce energy consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but device size and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cylindrical body design with large wheels creates a rolling motion that is inherently more energy-efficient than sliding or tumbling movements. The curved geometry allows the vacuum to roll smoothly over transitions and obstacles, reducing the energy required for navigation compared to angular, box-shaped designs that would require more force to change direction and overcome bumps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates a counterweight mechanism with a servomotor that adjusts the center of gravity to maintain balance during movement. This balance control system prevents energy-wasting tipping and stabilizes the device during transitions, thereby reducing overall energy consumption despite the larger wheel size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Extent of automation

If autonomous navigation capability is enhanced, then user intervention is reduced, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous navigation capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cylindrical design with large wheels provides inherent self-steering capabilities through its geometry. As the vacuum encounters obstacles or changes in terrain, the cylindrical shape naturally guides its movement and orientation, reducing the need for complex active steering mechanisms and sensors. This passive navigation assistance enhances autonomy while limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enables the robotic vacuum to autonomously navigate obstacles with minimal user intervention and reduced energy consumption, optimizing its vacuuming performance.

Implementation Method 1

a counterweight that is controlled by a servomotor and gyroscope to maintain the balance of the device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscope: Gyroscope

Data Source

PatentUS9521934B1Cylindrical robotic vacuum
Publication Date: 2016.12.20 BOBSWEEP
  • US9521934B1 patent drawing
  • US9521934B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic vacuum wherein the housing of the system is cylindrical in form with two wheels of diameter larger than the diameter of the housing supporting the housing on either end. Larger wheels permit the device to more easily travel over small bumps or obstacles and changes in elevation. Furthermore, the design requires less power to drive the housing, so more energy is available for the primary function of vacuuming.