Cytokine Design via Computational Residue Mutation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for stabilizing cytokines, such as those in the TNF ligand family, face challenges in enhancing thermal stability and altering selectivity/specificity for their receptors, with limitations in computational redesign algorithms and experimental screening procedures, particularly for larger multimeric molecules.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method combining computational redesign algorithms with manual input to mutate non-conserved residues in cytokine proteins, focusing on surface and inter-chain interface residues, to improve stability and selectivity/specificity, using alignment information and protein design algorithms like PERLA and FOLD-X to predict and validate mutations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If computational redesign algorithms are used to stabilize cytokines, then thermal stability is improved, but the complexity of the design process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal stabilityVSAvoiddesign process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying amino acid residues at specific positions in the cytokine sequence. The computational algorithms evaluate multiple sequence variants by changing parameters such as hydrophobicity, charge, and steric properties at targeted positions to optimize thermal stability while managing design complexity through focused residue selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary action through in silico screening and evaluation of potential mutations before experimental implementation. The computational redesign algorithms predict stability improvements for candidate variants, allowing the most promising designs to be selected for synthesis and testing, thereby reducing the complexity of the overall design process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If residues are mutated to alter receptor binding selectivity, then specificity for cognate receptors is improved, but the risk of losing general functionality increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceptor binding selectivityVSAvoidfunctional reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making targeted mutations at specific residues involved in receptor binding interfaces rather than global sequence changes. This allows alteration of binding selectivity for particular cognate receptors while preserving the overall cytokine structure and general functionality, thereby improving specificity without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where computational algorithms evaluate the predicted impact of mutations on both binding selectivity and functional stability. The design process iteratively refines variants based on predicted outcomes, allowing optimization of receptor specificity while monitoring and maintaining functional reliability through computational assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If extensive screening procedures are implemented to validate mutations, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemutation validation accuracyVSAvoidvariant development speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action through in silico validation and computational screening of mutations before experimental implementation. The algorithms predict which mutations are most likely to succeed based on structural and energetic criteria, allowing the research team to focus experimental resources on the most promising variants and thereby maintain high manufacturing precision without excessive productivity loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial action by implementing a tiered screening approach where not all possible mutations are validated experimentally. Instead, computational methods prioritize and filter variants, and only the most promising candidates undergo extensive experimental validation, balancing manufacturing precision with productivity by applying full screening rigor only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7994281B2Cytokine design
Publication Date: 2011.08.09 UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN
  • US7994281B2 patent drawing
  • US7994281B2 patent drawing
  • US7994281B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to novel methods for the design of proteins, in particular, cytokines. These methods allow the stabilisation of such cytokines, as well as modification of their selectivity/specificity for their cognate receptors. The invention also relates to various modified proteins that have been designed by the methods of the invention.